Page 5 of 5
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:58 am
by scott64
Any slot but 20 and 30 [:-]
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 6:05 am
by 1EyedJacks
ORIGINAL: ctangus
ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks
- no moving non-SEAC chinese units out of China without paying PP
I had a last-minute thought on this house rule. I have no problem with this rule as far as Burma and/or India goes. But what if I decide to invade Indochina? (The Japanese get 4 extra divs in that event.) Korea? (Yea, right, like I'd ever get there. [;)])
It's not a huge issue for me either way, but I'd like a
little more freedom of action, if only to present some more uncertainty to the Japanese. I'd prefer the house rule: no Chinese command units to Burma or India - any going there must be SEA Command.
Again - it's not a big deal to me either way - but I also don't want to start prepping 250K Chinese troops for an invasion of Indochina (as an example) if that would be considered unfair.
Hi ctangus - I'll let walkerd make the call on this as it's more in his neck of the woods [8|].
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:00 pm
by walkerd
ORIGINAL: ctangus
ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks
- no moving non-SEAC chinese units out of China without paying PP
I had a last-minute thought on this house rule. I have no problem with this rule as far as Burma and/or India goes. But what if I decide to invade Indochina? (The Japanese get 4 extra divs in that event.) Korea? (Yea, right, like I'd ever get there. [;)])
It's not a huge issue for me either way, but I'd like a
little more freedom of action, if only to present some more uncertainty to the Japanese. I'd prefer the house rule: no Chinese command units to Burma or India - any going there must be SEA Command.
Again - it's not a big deal to me either way - but I also don't want to start prepping 250K Chinese troops for an invasion of Indochina (as an example) if that would be considered unfair.
I have no problem what so ever. In general I leave your decisions to what you feel is right and appropriate. It sounds like we all want a decent, fun game based on "reality" or as close as we can get it.
Of course we are willing to negotiate your surrender now if you like.
First turn completed and sent to 1Eyedjacks. Any one know what order we will be sending the turn to. ie Whom should I send it too?
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:43 pm
by scott64
Wend the turn to anyone, I will not be around until Sat/Sunday
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 2:55 pm
by KDonovan
First turn completed and sent to 1Eyedjacks. Any one know what order we will be sending the turn to. ie Whom should I send it too?
since Scott won't be around till Sat/Sun...send the turn to Ctangus first...then he'll send it to me, then i'll send it to Scott
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:13 pm
by 1EyedJacks
ORIGINAL: KDonovan
First turn completed and sent to 1Eyedjacks. Any one know what order we will be sending the turn to. ie Whom should I send it too?
since Scott won't be around till Sat/Sun...send the turn to Ctangus first...then he'll send it to me, then i'll send it to Scott
Hi KDonovan,
I don't have ctangus's email address - can you send it to me? Thanks!
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:25 pm
by KDonovan
here's Ctangus email.......chuck_witp@verizon.net
hopefully we can get it back to you soon, as China is the only place were serious orders will be given.
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:03 pm
by 1EyedJacks
ORIGINAL: KDonovan
here's Ctangus email.......chuck_witp@verizon.net
hopefully we can get it back to you soon, as China is the only place were serious orders will be given.
Cool. I sent the turn a few minutes ago. Have a great Thanksgiving; Walkerd and I are really looking 4ward 2 this game <grin>
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:00 pm
by ctangus
ORIGINAL: walkerd
I have no problem what so ever. In general I leave your decisions to what you feel is right and appropriate. It sounds like we all want a decent, fun game based on "reality" or as close as we can get it.
OK, and yea, I think we have a good group of guys together for this game.
Of course we are willing to negotiate your surrender now if you like.
Bah - you're facing the 3 greatest strategists since Sun Tzu and Tully Bascombe! [:)]
ORIGINAL: 1EyedJacks
Cool. I sent the turn a few minutes ago. Have a great Thanksgiving; Walkerd and I are really looking 4ward 2 this game <grin>
It arrived safely. If I don't fall into an l-triptophane-induced slumber soon, I'll have it to Kenny tonight. Though with Scott out of town until Sunday I suppose there's no rush.
RE: Team game - looking for 1 Allied, 2 Japanese
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:57 pm
by ctangus
Mike -
Neither Kenny or I have Scott's e-mail address. I think you said you've already been playing him, correct? Could you post it? Thanks!