Page 5 of 5

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 11:54 pm
by vahauser
ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: vahauser

Um. Okay, Curtis...

I've bolded the relevant phrase. My preference is to not double-count the divisional specialists or include them as combat troops at all. That is the adjustment I make to that philosophy.

Since they aren't being double-counted and aren't available for offensive combat, do you actually have a reason for that? Sorry, but I'm not going to just sit by silently while you scurrilously disparage my methods with falsehoods. Defend your claims - if you can.

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

What? You have no disciples to your cause? Then you must needs redouble your efforts to proselytize the benighted and the heretics.



RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 6:03 am
by ColinWright
ORIGINAL: vahauser

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: vahauser

Um. Okay, Curtis...

I've bolded the relevant phrase. My preference is to not double-count the divisional specialists or include them as combat troops at all. That is the adjustment I make to that philosophy.

Since they aren't being double-counted and aren't available for offensive combat, do you actually have a reason for that? Sorry, but I'm not going to just sit by silently while you scurrilously disparage my methods with falsehoods. Defend your claims - if you can.

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

What? You have no disciples to your cause? Then you must needs redouble your efforts to proselytize the benighted and the heretics.



Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 10:50 am
by vahauser
ORIGINAL: ColinWright
Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.

He does seem capable of pontification, boorism, and demagoguery, though.

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 4:39 pm
by Curtis Lemay
ORIGINAL: vahauser

Where are your disciples come to defend you, oh Curtis?

I don't need any. I have the unbeatable advantage of being right.

Again:

I'm not double-counting the rear-area elements since they are in separate units and are debilitated from use offensively. That they can defend themselves if attacked is no different than what they would do in the real world.

And, they are not operating at full frontline proficency since they are de-leveraged by modeling only a fraction of their true numbers.

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 4:41 pm
by Curtis Lemay
ORIGINAL: vahauser

ORIGINAL: ColinWright
Curt's not all that good at proselytizing. I'm not even convinced he tries.

He does seem capable of pontification, boorism, and demagoguery, though.

If defending myself from scurrilous falsehoods constitutes such, then I'm guilty.

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:53 pm
by ColinWright
...

RE: Scenario Design Questions Regarding Divisional Summaries

Posted: Mon Jan 01, 2018 3:44 am
by VHauser
Europa 1947 revision