Page 5 of 5
RE: 4to1 HAHA
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:47 pm
by bigred
Is it worth fatiguing a zero sqn to kill allied planes???

RE: Luganville
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:56 pm
by bigred
Luganville has become the focus of both sides. Note in the attached screenprint 3 areas of operations. At PM the japs sporadically bomb the base to keep the Allies honest. USN lost one AK within the past week trying to ship into PM. Until the p38 comes on line allies will continue to have any power in this sector.
Below Cairns the lost 17th Corp continues to take a daily dose of vitamin Iron as 80+ p39s get target practice on a daily basis.
At Luganville the allies are working on a minefield just to the south as the KB lurks 7 hexes to the north. On the previous turn 2 USN DDs were sunk by IJN KB air. What a dangerous game we play. Allied advantage is short distance of damaged ship to port and easy fly distance to Luganville. Allied subs never were attrited properly earlier in the game. This turn one took a shot at the Kaga. IJN advantage is the ring of islands around luganville cause a major mineclearing operation to occur and 3 allied cariers are sunk w/ 2 accounted for in the AO..

RE: Luganville
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:38 pm
by bigred
In a thunderstorm the KB delivers a lite blow to the allied DD fleet as Ikesan pounds Luganville w/ shore bombardment. Probably sank about 3 DD's.

RE: Marines are ashore
Posted: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:06 am
by bigred
1st Marine division has landed at Luganville supported by a paradrop on the first day. The IJN Surface response team is slow to do anything after the losses at Townsville. The fort was reduced from a 5 to a 4. With the 35th brigade artillery the IJA had hoped to push the allies into the sea, just like Efate(hehehe). Not to be.

RE: fort level 2
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:54 pm
by bigred
Luganville is at fort level 2 three days after the landing. The KB is 7 hexes north and the allied CV TF has withdrawn south of efate. Minor night action resulted in the sinking of the APD Manley.
RE: 35th Brigade
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:16 am
by bigred
When I studied the TOE of the IJA 35th Brigade I was impressed by the siege artillery and the AT guns. I figured the design of the unit was for fort reduction. I also felt the arty units could really do some damage to allied units if the guns could survive the Air and sea bombardments. On the last allied ground attack at Luganville the allies could not raise a 1-1 attack. The allied fleet has not returned to bombard the hex and I wonder if the minefield damage made the situation dificult for IKESAN. In addition A6M2s have been freely able to ground strafe the allied units. I am not sure Ike will be able to push IJA out unless he commits the 2nd Marine Division in November. And the Ija gets two fresh divisons soon also.

RE: 35th Brigade
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:20 am
by bigred
A look at the daily grind of air power on Luganville.

RE: 35th Brigade
Posted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:28 am
by Kingfisher
Just curious, what does the "FR" stand for in the IJA 39th FR Construction Bn.
RE: 35th Brigade
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:57 am
by bigred
RE: Gaining Odds
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:14 pm
by bigred
10-27-43
"I am gaining the odds at Lugainville" Ikesan99

RE: Luganville fallen
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:44 am
by bigred
The allies have pushed the japs out of Luganville.

RE: GiliGili
Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:48 am
by bigred
The allies have sunk the Hiyo NW of GG.

RE: GiliGili
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:19 am
by bigred
the IJair wanted to do some return damage and caught some P39s at 15000ft.

RE: Surrender
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:09 pm
by bigred
The IJ forces have conceded a 2-1 victory to Ike99. Ike was the most experienced allied commander I have played and he has tought me some lessons. I will let Ike post some statistics.

RE: Surrender
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:58 am
by Ike99
I will let Ike post some statistics.

RE: Surrender
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:00 am
by Ike99
Bombers in this close so early is game, set and match.

RE: Surrender
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:26 am
by Ike99