Page 5 of 12
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:18 pm
by bwheatley
This turn certainly put a bit more wind in my sails. Cut off 2 MD 1PD near smolensk. Cut off wiking in the south. Routed a 3rd MD. Really helps.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:45 pm
by bwheatley
Ground Losses

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:46 pm
by bwheatley
Air Losses

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:46 pm
by bwheatley
Destroyed Units

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:52 pm
by bwheatley
The magic germans managed to dodge every bullet.

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:55 pm
by bwheatley
I managed to break open the smolensk pocket and counter encircle 1 PD and 2 MD.

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:56 pm
by bwheatley
We had to hit the 20th MD with everything we had but we managed to route them. It is a small victory but the small victories help morale.

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:58 pm
by bwheatley
The counterpockets around smolensk.
The situation at the end of the turn.

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:00 pm
by bwheatley
In the south we kept trying some more encirclements. We rushed forward and tried to tie ara's hands a bit
We did manage to cut off Wiking. I hope this will cause ara to slow down and be a bit more cautious.

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:01 pm
by bwheatley
With the wiking situation i had 9th Army that was trying to protect the flank of odessa. With odessa captured i was able to shift them to help keep wiking under wraps.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:19 pm
by bwheatley
Hearing from ara he is a bit unhappy with the turn. He's bummed about all the units i cut off so that makes my day a lot brighter. He also said leningrad is going to be a slog this time instead of an easy right hook around ilmen and a cut off rail line.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:20 pm
by bwheatley
He said he broke through to the units around smolensk. But we have held him up a few turns now.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:30 pm
by kirkgregerson
Yeah I like it when I upset my opponents, it means I'm doing something right for a change.
[8D]
It's difficult for the Soviets in summer 41 to hold an encirclement of German units. But you can delay them with this tactic as you just did. Well done.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:40 pm
by bwheatley
Ground Losses
Air Losses
Destroyed Units
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:41 pm
by bwheatley
North of Map
As we see it looks like he was able to push 4 hexes down the line. Now he's only 2 hexes from cutting the rail line. I'm contemplating pulling out. What do you guys think? In every other game i lose leningrad and i'm not sure if i want to suffer the loss of the 500,000 men in northwest & northern fronts.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:51 pm
by bwheatley
Center

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:52 pm
by bwheatley
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:11 pm
by Q-Ball
I wouldn't pull out of Leningrad completely. I noticed you haven't fortified the "Back Door" hex at all, though, so you will fall quickly to siege if he reaches Lake Ladoga. If I am him, I don't bother getting to the Svir, and instead go straight for the Neva.
That being said, I would pile-on that spearhead along the Volkhov, and I would pull back out of the bulge to the West of that for the most part, though leave a line of units along the Rough and in front of Kolpino/Pushkin. There are a series of swamp hexes to the NW of that spearhead; have a unit in all of them. Make him fight to Ladoga. Don't worry about defending the spearhead to the SE, around Lake Ilmen; a Panzer thrust in that direction wouild be doing you a favor, and at any rate, they are fixed on Leningrad.
Make sure you get all the Cavalry out of that bulge, and over the Volkhov; those are the most valuable units.
But your're doomed up there regardless. I wouldn't send anymore reinforcements, because once Leningrad falls, you can just pull back into the endless forests up there.
RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:40 pm
by bwheatley
Yea i goofed up with the new fort rules. Next game i'll probably have a better handle on it. Though in every game with ara so far this is the one where at least leningrad didn't fall to a surprise thrust somewhere i was not expecting it.
What is the back door hex you're talking about? Having lost leningrad every time perhaps its a concept i need to pay attention to

RE: Bwheatley vs abulbulian GC 1.5.18 beta (no abulbulian)
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:39 pm
by kirkgregerson
I think the back door hex Q-ball is referring to is across the Nerva getting the port. Don't be to hard on yourself about Leningrad. I've yet to see a capable axis player not take it if he really pushed for it. That appears to be what is happening here. I would still make him pay for every inch, but get the good units out. You only need cheap infantry units in key locations.