Page 5 of 5
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 10:12 pm
by broccolini

- 5a.png (2.36 MiB) Viewed 3827 times

- 7a.png (2.51 MiB) Viewed 3827 times

- 8a.png (2.85 MiB) Viewed 3827 times
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 2:36 pm
by 700851McCall
Great AAR, really been enjoying it.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:34 am
by broccolini
Thanks. Glad to hear it.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2023 12:35 am
by broccolini

- 1a.png (2.74 MiB) Viewed 3775 times

- 2a.png (2.63 MiB) Viewed 3775 times

- 3a.png (2.61 MiB) Viewed 3775 times
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2023 5:44 pm
by StuccoFresco
Looks like the Axis is done, aside from not getting their objectives back it seems their entire line is quite shaky now.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 11:45 pm
by broccolini

- 6a.png (2 MiB) Viewed 3647 times

- 7a.png (2.27 MiB) Viewed 3647 times
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 9:30 am
by Mkha2023
Great AAR!
Any updates on the theater?
Thx.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Fri May 03, 2024 8:35 pm
by broccolini

- 5f.png (2.56 MiB) Viewed 3350 times

- 6f.png (2.34 MiB) Viewed 3350 times
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Sat May 04, 2024 9:04 am
by Mkha2023
Thank you for the update!
This was a very entertaining and insightful read.
The NAfrica caimpaigns were really make it or break it, back and forth. Unforgiving.
Was a bit concerned about that TOAW5 remark....was hoping that a new update would be for toaw4.... Just bought the thing. 
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Sat May 04, 2024 7:27 pm
by ASPARTANSPEAKS
I say old chap, jolly good show!
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Mon May 06, 2024 10:10 pm
by ASPARTANSPEAKS
I haven't played this scenario, yet, but looks to be exceedingly difficult to win a victory playing the axis side.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 2:45 pm
by broccolini
The Axis side is more difficult in my opinion but not impossible. You have to be very careful how you spend your available resources and use them at the right time. An offensive launched with fresh divisions (not worn down by repeated frontal assaults'), when the Shock advantage is in Axis favor, and after a week or so of artillery bombardments, would have shattered the line and probably destroyed desert force.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 3:07 pm
by Curtis Lemay
broccolini wrote: Tue May 07, 2024 2:45 pm
The Axis side is more difficult in my opinion but not impossible. You have to be very careful how you spend your available resources and use them at the right time. An offensive launched with fresh divisions (not worn down by repeated frontal assaults'), when the Shock advantage is in Axis favor, and after a week or so of artillery bombardments, would have shattered the line and probably destroyed desert force.
It's so hard to avoid 20:20 hindsight issues with this entire topic. Historically, O'Connor didn't know Rommel was on the way and the entire theater had gone into "occupation mode". You, however, knew he was coming and fortified all you had at a constriction point.
Nevertheless, the Axis could have played better, starting with not pointlessly squandering bunches of Italians around Bengazi for no benefit (it actually doesn't take much skill to salvage much of the Italian artillery - giving a huge edge when Rommel arrives). Then he put the foot-bound Italians in the open and the motorized DAK in the dunes. The other way around would have worked much better. And, as you said, waiting for the shock benefits would have helped, too.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Tue May 07, 2024 3:24 pm
by broccolini
Curtis Lemay wrote: Tue May 07, 2024 3:07 pm
broccolini wrote: Tue May 07, 2024 2:45 pm
The Axis side is more difficult in my opinion but not impossible. You have to be very careful how you spend your available resources and use them at the right time. An offensive launched with fresh divisions (not worn down by repeated frontal assaults'), when the Shock advantage is in Axis favor, and after a week or so of artillery bombardments, would have shattered the line and probably destroyed desert force.
It's so hard to avoid 20:20 hindsight issues with this entire topic. Historically, O'Connor didn't know Rommel was on the way and the entire theater had gone into "occupation mode". You, however, knew he was coming and fortified all you had at a constriction point.
Nevertheless, the Axis could have played better, starting with not pointlessly squandering bunches of Italians around Bengazi for no benefit (it actually doesn't take much skill to salvage much of the Italian artillery - giving a huge edge when Rommel arrives). Then he put the foot-bound Italians in the open and the motorized DAK in the dunes. The other way around would have worked much better. And, as you said, waiting for the shock benefits would have helped, too.
Agreed.
Re: Campaign for North Africa 40-43
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2026 8:31 am
by StuccoFresco
Great AAR, thanks.