Page 5 of 5

RE: Another suggestion ..

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 5:59 pm
by Captain Cruft
Forgive me for being dense or perhaps blind. What actual changes have you made to the heavy AA devices to lower their effect? I agree with the aim BTW.

RE: Another suggestion ..

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:35 pm
by Nikademus
You mean increase their effect.

Ceilings were reduced to 25,000 to eliminate the 7-9000 foot min alt barrier and gun effect rating was increased to allow them to be more effective

RE: Another suggestion ..

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:35 pm
by Captain Cruft
Ah OK I see. Thought it might be that. Does no flak over 25,000 ft matter? I presume bombers are useless at that altitude whatever.

RE: Another suggestion ..

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 7:45 pm
by Nikademus
it could be exploited even though the bombing hits are much more sparce than at the sweet spot of 6000 feet. I've read about player complaints in regards to "Stratosphere" bombing so assume that with high enough exp groups they could exploit it. (Personally i've never done stratosphere bombing for the simple reason that i never felt the need too....could always bomb comfortably around the 10k level)

Hence in the FAQ i suggested that a manditory house rule be put into place limiting max bombing alt to 25k so that the guns can at least take a few potshots (they wont do much at such a height of course)

RE: Another suggestion ..

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:27 am
by Nikademus
ORIGINAL: ckk

Hey Nik Mod 3.0

Some of my Liberty ships are showing up with 7200 capacity. It's because in the database they are pointed at class slot 1486 not slot 389. Should I change the capacity in the database or is this what you wanted to do?

Checked.....looks like it's a boo boo in Pry's scnenario as well. I have corrected for 4.0