Page 43 of 44
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:03 pm
by catwhoorg
*nods*
I have a CS convoy set up shutting resources between Tasmania and the mainland.
I use Launceston to Sale for the minimal exposure to subs and have an armed merchant escort.
Elmer parked a sub in this area, chased it off with damage with DDs from Sydney, but I think one will be back.
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:50 pm
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: catwhoorg
*nods*
I have a CS convoy set up shutting resources between Tasmania and the mainland.
I use Launceston to Sale for the minimal exposure to subs and have an armed merchant escort.
Elmer parked a sub in this area, chased it off with damage with DDs from Sydney, but I think one will be back.
I'll keep you informed about what Elmer does in this area. Thanks for posting your experience(s) w/ that.
Jim and I exchanged files and here's some combat results you haven't seen yet. I'm still beating up on the Manila remnants.
EDIT: Yeah, I just now noticed that I'm posting the combat results to the wrong AAR. I'm thinking I'll just leave them up as
advertizement for another AAR.
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:59 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs hit Georgetown w/ an air raid:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:06 pm
by larryfulkerson
And just then Darwin was hit by an air raid:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:13 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then just north of Singapore, at Johore Bahru there was some action:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:15 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was a furball over Java:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:22 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was some action at Port Moresby:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:26 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was an attack at Singapore in which I lost a third of my Vals for 1 hit on a sub. I'm going to turn off the Vals from now on.
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:30 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then there was a B-17 raid on Port Moresby:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:33 pm
by larryfulkerson
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.
What's the record for the number of hits sustained by a sub w/o sinking?

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:36 pm
by larryfulkerson
Mersing saw some ground action. I forced some Allied vehicles to go back to where they came from:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:38 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the Allies do their daily ground bombardment of Port Moresby:
EDIT: this combat result is posted in the wrong AAR. Please disreguard.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:38 pm
by larryfulkerson
And of course, here's the combat report:
RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:41 am
by larryfulkerson
CL Roto Ruter was last hit by a 250kg bomb and isn't doing so well here lately, in fact it's still on fire, so I'm leaving it docked at the port
to help the fire go out before I try to ship it to a repair yard somewhere. If it survives long enough to be driven there. The Allied CV that
did the damage is still in the AO and still dangerous but the base where Roto Ruter is has the largest congregation of CAP fighters that I
have I believe. So it's possibly the safest place for Roto Ruter to be right now.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:48 am
by larryfulkerson
TF 274 is a bunch of short-ranged transports and they have enough fuel to make it to Canton Island where they will be refueled and sent
on their way toward Pearl. I'm wondering if they will have to be fully refueled at Palmyra before they can make it all the way to Pearl. I'll
have to make a mental note to check that before they leave the Palmyra AO.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:56 pm
by larryfulkerson
I've never had an Engineering Casualty before. It's kind of exciting. So there's some major damage to fix that wasn't there before. Okay.

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:31 pm
by larryfulkerson
One of my subs is having a good day:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:34 pm
by larryfulkerson
One of my subs is not having such a wonderful day:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:37 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then Taiping gets a Jap air raid:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap AI ver 7.0
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:39 pm
by larryfulkerson
And then the Dutch try to sink the Jap carrier:
