Page 50 of 82
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:40 pm
by AllenK
Box 2 please.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:41 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Allies 4, axis 5.
Does Allies choose only box 0?

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:44 pm
by AllenK
Yes thanks.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:45 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
France uses 4 points to choose surface combat?

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:46 pm
by AllenK
Yes thanks
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:49 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Italy chooses to abort Trans and HQ to safe. I wish I had planned this. The only port in Greece is occupied with German INF and INF HQ. Time to sacrifice INF.
Edit: Allies stay? Axis abort.

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:52 pm
by AllenK
Sounds good.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:54 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I continue tomorrow, it is getting late.
Program did not ask to destroy any units. I think I have to do it manually and make a suicide attack with INF.

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 6:33 pm
by AlbertN
You could have just aborted one in Rhodes or Dodecanese though?
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:27 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes but I wanted it to mainland.
Though I realized shorty after my post why I chose combined, not naval. My plan was to land HQ to island next to Athens. Maybe I need to write down my plans in the future.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 12:20 pm
by AlbertN
But with a TPS aborted you need also a port in that Island to have your HQ get there!
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:31 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes, that's why I can't understand why I aborted transporter. Plan was not to do it and debark HQ to island. At the moment result 2A came I though "great, I can abort HQ to safe". Then I aborted everything else, also planes. So smart...
Edit: You might think I was drunk, but this time I was not at all

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:38 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Over stacking was taken care after carpet bombing. INF was destroyed.
Ground strikes: First Paris.

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:39 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Athens

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:40 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Northern China

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 2:53 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
And the last one...

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 3:00 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
We have a unique situation in China. North Temperate is snow, North Monsoon is fine. Part of the lake is frozen.
Units are able to cross the frozen lake because units in city don't have ZoC. Attack!!!

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 3:07 pm
by AllenK
Drat and double drat!!!

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 3:21 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Japan rails GAR from Haichow to Tungkwan.
Japanese troops in south moves few hexes.
2 attacks, one next to Paris and another in Cangsha China.
Japan uses attacking HQ support and sends 2 points ground support.
Does China want to use ground support or intercept Japanese fighter-bombers? Japan can intercept with fighter.

RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 3:33 pm
by AllenK
Let's take a punt.
Fly the Mohawk as a bomber, with the I-16 providing an escort of sorts.