Help from Axis Players..please
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:11 am
Well i've had WaW for about a year but couldn't play until recently due to a computer purchase, pity I didn't grab 1GB RAM but thats a story for another day.
Also as a side note this post goes on for a while because I'm really frustrated but could somebody please make a point to tell me how to get Japan to attack USSR...because people talk about it but I don't know how its done.
Anyways the game so far is disturbingly addictive [&o]
However I am having inclinations of losing patience with the game insofar as all my (8 or so) game so far follow a very familiar pattern that doesn't deviate very much.
I start well up until about 1943-44 then it all goes downhill slowly. At first i started to invade Africa which does nicely, but come closer to 1943 and the Allies always land in morocco and later West France.
Coupled with the inevitable Ruskie invasion in W1943 and I've got 3 theatres of combat and a Production Point/Resource Point deficit thats always around 50 to the allies combined 180 or so.
So in the last game which I just finished as of about 20 minutes ago I did much better this time. I completely ignored the defence of North Africa, focused all my building energies and research on fighter, heavy bomber and Panzer pretty. Massed ALL the forces I could build and move to the Easter Front and hit Soviet Russia I think around 1942 Spring(ish). Got Leningrad and the usual stuff Kiev etc, made it to the boarder of Moscow but by this time I couldn't go any further.
I had the Panzers so jumped up on research they were literally unbeatable, but I never had enough men to go around to reasonably occupy all territories and the Russians refused to mass their forces in a single location...(obviously) so I could never really deal a knockoutblow.
However what ultimately lost it was by around this time the russians would have eventually been beaten for sure...but then the Allies invaded West France and I had to divert around 4 Panzers and 3 Fighters to beat them back to the sea.
This seasaw action in West France lasted uncomfortably long (5-7 odd turns) where I'd liberate but they'd liberate back etc. In the end I had a combined committment of 12 Panzers, 6 heavy bombers, 3 or 4 odd Fighters committed to the West to keep them the f*ck out for good.
Also I'd managed to take Gibraltar because they left it undefended for some odd reason. Consequently I combined Baltic and Med German fleets into one big fleet in the pacific and proceeded to cut their supply lines which would have worked...if I had the supplies and the time myself.
By this time Russia in the East has taken back everything I took from them and they are literally producing say 6 fighters and 2-3 odd tanks per turn which is disturbing to say the least.
Ultimately I had that feeling wqhich I'd had for many turns where its obvious the russians could be held back due to my superior tanks but in the end they'd slowly just roll over you like what happen in real history.
I guess I'm really stumped. Because from how I see things I don't see how its even remotely possible to commit forces to North Africa, East Russian Front and (think) about trying to invade or at least neutralise England.
I don't see how its possible to spread forces so thin and triumph significantly in any area.
Especially considering as when the Allies invade Morocco their force is usually about 3 times the size of my North Africa one and England always has damn AA guns which prevents me from dominating English skies.
In short I know that in order to win you need to amass resources and factories as quickly as possible to make up ground on the allies.
But I don't see how that task is compatible when it takes say 2 turns or so to build a panzer and when you factor in the other things you need to build ultimately across 3 theaters your forces are spread ice thin and especially the russians can break you easily.
Which is why in this game I sent all my forces and all my efforts to the East and ignored all other theatres under the idea that if I could knock Russia out by say 1945 then I would win ultimately.
So honestly i've got the game set on Easy at the moment but jesus its hard.
Also could somebody please tell me how to get Japan to attack the USSR??? I heard people speak about it but nobody says how. If i could get Japan to attack the USSR or at least divert their attention a bit that would be so much better.
And if the Allies conquer Japan I could care less (correct me if i'm wrong here) because I figure if i dominate all europe and the vast majority of USSR territories then the allies ultimately have no chance because their ground forces SUCK.
As a final note in this game I speak about I lasted until 1948 but I could have gone until 1950 probably but I packed it in because the result was inevitable.
Also as a side note this post goes on for a while because I'm really frustrated but could somebody please make a point to tell me how to get Japan to attack USSR...because people talk about it but I don't know how its done.
Anyways the game so far is disturbingly addictive [&o]
However I am having inclinations of losing patience with the game insofar as all my (8 or so) game so far follow a very familiar pattern that doesn't deviate very much.
I start well up until about 1943-44 then it all goes downhill slowly. At first i started to invade Africa which does nicely, but come closer to 1943 and the Allies always land in morocco and later West France.
Coupled with the inevitable Ruskie invasion in W1943 and I've got 3 theatres of combat and a Production Point/Resource Point deficit thats always around 50 to the allies combined 180 or so.
So in the last game which I just finished as of about 20 minutes ago I did much better this time. I completely ignored the defence of North Africa, focused all my building energies and research on fighter, heavy bomber and Panzer pretty. Massed ALL the forces I could build and move to the Easter Front and hit Soviet Russia I think around 1942 Spring(ish). Got Leningrad and the usual stuff Kiev etc, made it to the boarder of Moscow but by this time I couldn't go any further.
I had the Panzers so jumped up on research they were literally unbeatable, but I never had enough men to go around to reasonably occupy all territories and the Russians refused to mass their forces in a single location...(obviously) so I could never really deal a knockoutblow.
However what ultimately lost it was by around this time the russians would have eventually been beaten for sure...but then the Allies invaded West France and I had to divert around 4 Panzers and 3 Fighters to beat them back to the sea.
This seasaw action in West France lasted uncomfortably long (5-7 odd turns) where I'd liberate but they'd liberate back etc. In the end I had a combined committment of 12 Panzers, 6 heavy bombers, 3 or 4 odd Fighters committed to the West to keep them the f*ck out for good.
Also I'd managed to take Gibraltar because they left it undefended for some odd reason. Consequently I combined Baltic and Med German fleets into one big fleet in the pacific and proceeded to cut their supply lines which would have worked...if I had the supplies and the time myself.
By this time Russia in the East has taken back everything I took from them and they are literally producing say 6 fighters and 2-3 odd tanks per turn which is disturbing to say the least.
Ultimately I had that feeling wqhich I'd had for many turns where its obvious the russians could be held back due to my superior tanks but in the end they'd slowly just roll over you like what happen in real history.
I guess I'm really stumped. Because from how I see things I don't see how its even remotely possible to commit forces to North Africa, East Russian Front and (think) about trying to invade or at least neutralise England.
I don't see how its possible to spread forces so thin and triumph significantly in any area.
Especially considering as when the Allies invade Morocco their force is usually about 3 times the size of my North Africa one and England always has damn AA guns which prevents me from dominating English skies.
In short I know that in order to win you need to amass resources and factories as quickly as possible to make up ground on the allies.
But I don't see how that task is compatible when it takes say 2 turns or so to build a panzer and when you factor in the other things you need to build ultimately across 3 theaters your forces are spread ice thin and especially the russians can break you easily.
Which is why in this game I sent all my forces and all my efforts to the East and ignored all other theatres under the idea that if I could knock Russia out by say 1945 then I would win ultimately.
So honestly i've got the game set on Easy at the moment but jesus its hard.
Also could somebody please tell me how to get Japan to attack the USSR??? I heard people speak about it but nobody says how. If i could get Japan to attack the USSR or at least divert their attention a bit that would be so much better.
And if the Allies conquer Japan I could care less (correct me if i'm wrong here) because I figure if i dominate all europe and the vast majority of USSR territories then the allies ultimately have no chance because their ground forces SUCK.
As a final note in this game I speak about I lasted until 1948 but I could have gone until 1950 probably but I packed it in because the result was inevitable.
