Page 1 of 1
Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:09 pm
by m10bob
[:D][:D][:D]

RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:17 pm
by robot
I count 16 may be more out of sight dont know. I dont believe my m10 in the game can do as well.
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:23 pm
by Riun T
Just tell me that the guy layin in the foreground,DIDN'T fall off the pile?![X(]
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:31 pm
by m10bob
ORIGINAL: Riun T
Just tell me that the guy layin in the foreground,DIDN'T fall off the pile?![X(]

RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:33 am
by 264rifle
I'd be willing to bet they don't drive 30mph with that many men on board unless they want to leave a few guys lying in the road.[;)]
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:23 am
by Nighthawk12
Hey, what do you know, the first version of reactive armour. . .
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm
by m10bob
ORIGINAL: Nighthawk12
Hey, what do you know, the first version of reactive armour. . .
Kinda gives a whole new meaning to the order "ARMOR....DEPLOY!"[8D]
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:51 am
by Kevin E. Duguay
Nice target!!
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:18 am
by m10bob
Uhhhh....I just remembered....The correct order was...."UNASS THE VEHICLE"!
How in the hell did I forget that?
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:12 am
by Kevin E. Duguay
Picture was posed![>:]
RE: Always an exception to the "Carrying" capacity
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:13 am
by Kevin E. Duguay
This was too!!!
