Page 1 of 1
need help.
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:20 am
by quan357
I have been trying to get starshatter to run on my computer for the past few days now, I've defragged my hard drive, got an update from windows, but I still keep getting a message saying error and windows will have to shut down, send a report or don't send. I have sent that report about four times now and I still keep getting the same thing. I have attached a copy of my dxdiag for you to read. thanks for the help.
RE: need help.
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 5:45 pm
by Marc von Martial
Hi, your DirectX dialog shows that you run an Integrated Graphic chip, not a dedicated Graphic Card. These IGPs normally used shared RAM. Also the dirvers of this chip are 2 years old.
The minimum specs for SS-TGS are:
- Windows 98/SE/ME/2000/XP
- Pentium III 1Ghz or Athlon Equivalent
- Pentium IV 2.4 Ghz Recommended
- 512 MB RAM Required, 1 GB Recommended
- Direct X9 compatible 32 MB video card (Pixel 2.0 Support Shader Recommended)
Your IGP sadly is no way near the minimal specs for the graphic/video card.
Next victam - shut up and pay/buy
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:04 pm
by rainbowbeamer
The minimum specs for SS-TGS are:
What double speak .... have one standard, one specs, not the non Henry Ford model and the minimum systems brought out for WHAT.
My angels deserve only the best not Jewed down ( I was born into this notion, I did not coin it) quality and hyper financed too.
BAD DOG you mess in our minds, life and equipment.
Windows 98/SE/ME/2000/XP
Pentium III 1Ghz or Athlon Equivalent
Pentium IV 2.4 Ghz Recommended
512 MB RAM Required, 1 GB Recommended
Direct X9 compatible 32 MB video card (Pixel 2.0 Support Shader Recommended)
And insulted all the way to the buy here get slayed here breeds, better offer an exchange to those that are not educated by sales or suffer progaganda.
No intergrity in this business anywhere .... just buy, buy, buy, more obsolesence .....
No more game purchases for me .... it ain't worth it, and two or three wonderful games is really enough .... thousands of suck platforms made and software bullies the obsoleting systems.
Hey hostages to the dysfunction, find our ways out of this reduced value experiences for all we got money wise.
FAIR IS FAIR, RIGHT IS RIGHT, EXCUSEs are the industry - see license agreement, be surprised if it works and does not damage your system, pay here for advise, never protection.
Your IGP sadly is no way near the minimal specs for the graphic/video card.
RE: Next victam - shut up and pay/buy
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:59 pm
by Hertston
ORIGINAL: rainbowbeamer
What double speak .... have one standard, one specs, not the non Henry Ford model and the minimum systems brought out for WHAT.
'One standard' is what consoles are for. It's simply not possible with PC's, there is too much variation in hardware. As that gets more powerful, new software adapts. For any game that is remotely graphically demanding (and there's far worse than Starshatter in that respect), you need a 'gamers' graphics card to handle it.
Always read the required specs and make sure your system is adequate. If you don't, you only have yourself to blame. The 'industry' isn't going to graphically cripple games like Armed Assault and Silent Hunter 4 just to suit those who don't bother.
Make it so.
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 2:53 am
by rainbowbeamer
See environmentaly sad all the landfill blowing out of industry. Computers at the top.
Seems like a client side system to hook up to gamers servers to play is the ticket.
Pay for play or lifetime accesses for a persons favorite, the past and present. One can even add a value added charge everytime game upgrades to next generation.
All business practise is a road to jip right now. Why so much deceptive competition on the arguement "our is so better and so cheaper" - never happens, only one price, the right price.
Oh, so these engineers got a "breakthrough" you say, get that NOW.
Forget it, you all brainwashed and mind control and so smart your actually stupid in the final analysis.
All sizzle, rancid steak. When everyone is responciple to do it, no one does it, it is the other person going to do it. Same with this idea, if anything can happen in computer science, well, then actually nothing happens. Especially if a twenty free ain't flying in for the "personal touch" from our fine feathered friends, technomaniacs.
A real computer guy like Jaron Lanier will catch the jist of this, you can as well.
I'll stop here, remind you I'm trying to be positive but outloud and hope the next wave is refreshing, not a new twisted twisted fried and spicy Cheeto corny crack commericialized poece of stoned high technology.
Leave the buzzes to humans and other organics, we can handle it better than any machine inorganic ever will. Advance to the rear, be in "engineering" on time or be shot !!!!
Space flight, riding in a trash can, call the program Sesame Street and not asstronaughts, but Oscarenhiemersbergbaumsteingreengolds !!!!!
Fair is fair. BE FAIR.
All is good, nah, just good is good !!!
RE: Make it so.
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:49 am
by wdboyd
Rainbowbeamer, there is nothing wrong with the game.
Please spare us any more of your mindless, roaming and non-sensical comments. [>:]
RE: Make it so.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:21 pm
by FrattonFreak
Boyd, you are nothing but a post whore and its you I'm afraid that most people here find the bore
There is a lot of improvements that can be made to the game. Many of the issues should really have been found during testing. Raising these should be congratulated, not mocked
Your holier than thou post replies are really not at all helpful and simply show you up. There is much more I'd like to say but lets leave it at that
RE: Make it so.
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:34 pm
by JT
I agree with wdboyd here. Rainbowreamer (teehee) must've been smoking something
really good when he was making these posts...
