What happened?
Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 6:19 pm
I opened 1.916d and looked around. What happened to the ANV's cavalry? It was my main defense against the AOP, and now they're gone. Not just one brigade, which I could understand, but I'm down six brigades. What happened? It shouldn't have been done in the name of play balance, because the greater ranges of infantry weapons in the new version should substantially lessen the power of cavalry with carbines.
I also noticed that Ewell no longer taught oblique fire, and in fact no one on either side did. So I opened a new game with the same result, and it wasn't until the fourth time I opened the game that Ewell regained his ability to teach oblique fire. I didn't keep track of other abilities (I'm not that anal). Have the generals' teaching abilities been randomized?
And Berdan's Sharpshooters have the Sharps rifle before that advance has been researched. Was that done on purpose?
For the South it won't be realistic to say you can replace the cavalry within a short time. The first turn's resources go to arming the ANV, the second turn's to arming the troops in the west, the next to the British, all the while trying to save money for camps and research buildings. You have to build at least one unit of siege artillery to have any offensive credibility in the west, and the lead time for that means you have to start building as soon as possible. And then there's arming the troops that you muster. Any chance in the next version of the possibility of mustering cavalry if you have the horses?
I have to thank you for the extra artillery. But what happened to my cavalry? [&:]
I also noticed that Ewell no longer taught oblique fire, and in fact no one on either side did. So I opened a new game with the same result, and it wasn't until the fourth time I opened the game that Ewell regained his ability to teach oblique fire. I didn't keep track of other abilities (I'm not that anal). Have the generals' teaching abilities been randomized?
And Berdan's Sharpshooters have the Sharps rifle before that advance has been researched. Was that done on purpose?
For the South it won't be realistic to say you can replace the cavalry within a short time. The first turn's resources go to arming the ANV, the second turn's to arming the troops in the west, the next to the British, all the while trying to save money for camps and research buildings. You have to build at least one unit of siege artillery to have any offensive credibility in the west, and the lead time for that means you have to start building as soon as possible. And then there's arming the troops that you muster. Any chance in the next version of the possibility of mustering cavalry if you have the horses?
I have to thank you for the extra artillery. But what happened to my cavalry? [&:]