Page 1 of 1
CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:56 pm
by Andrew Brown
Nikademus has kindly revised the "Nikmod" versions of CHS 2.08 to be compatible with Nikmod 9.1. This should prevent the problem seen with the earlier (8.0) scenarios in which aircraft could take too long to repair once damaged.
I have uploaded the scenarios to my WitP website, where they can be downloaded from the
CHS Download web page.
A big thanks to Nikademus for providing these scenarios. If there are any problems with them, please let me and/or Nikademus know.
Andrew
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 2:48 pm
by rockmedic109
I think I have found two errors in the database. F4U-1 DUR is 108. Ki-83 DUR is 88. I am assuming that these are double what they should be {at least F4U-1 would be close at 54 compared to the others}.
It looks like the Huge torp load on Shiratsuyu was fixed.
If anyone is playing the AI, they might want to drop the Fortifications at Hong Kong to 2 or 3. With the unmodded value of 4, the AI never takes Hong Kong....and that is with No Replacements set on Hong Kong LCUs. I started scen 157 with 0 Forts and it fell on Dec 8 {oops}. I am going to restart with 158b and set it for 2 and see how that works.
Thanks for the great work. I appreciate it, though I think my wife may be hiring Guido the Leg-Breaker.
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:43 pm
by rockmedic109
Maybe another error. P-36A has Device 161 Browning .50 MG. Shouldn't it be Device 160 Nose mounted Broning .50 MG?
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:45 pm
by Nikademus
P-36A in NM never had it though technically I suppose it should since it does have a centerline. (Didn't bother for P-26 either since both planes exit so fast)
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:47 pm
by Nikademus
ORIGINAL: rockmedic109
I think I have found two errors in the database. F4U-1 DUR is 108. Ki-83 DUR is 88. I am assuming that these are double what they should be {at least F4U-1 would be close at 54 compared to the others}.
It looks like the Huge torp load on Shiratsuyu was fixed.
If anyone is playing the AI, they might want to drop the Fortifications at Hong Kong to 2 or 3. With the unmodded value of 4, the AI never takes Hong Kong....and that is with No Replacements set on Hong Kong LCUs. I started scen 157 with 0 Forts and it fell on Dec 8 {oops}. I am going to restart with 158b and set it for 2 and see how that works.
Thanks for the great work. I appreciate it, though I think my wife may be hiring Guido the Leg-Breaker.
F4U DUR should be 54, Ki-83 not in NM so i'll have to take a look.
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 4:03 pm
by rockmedic109
DUR 88 would give the Ki-83 the same DUR as a B-29. Doesn't seem right so I halved it to 44 based on the Corsair being doubled.
And I can't recall ever having the P-36A in battle, so I guess it really doesn't matter too much about it's armament.
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 4:06 pm
by Nikademus
most likely its an error though 44 seems low for a twin engine fighter in NM. Bomber and fighter DUR are modified seperately for 9.1
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:05 pm
by Nikademus
Corrections made and sent to Andrew for uploading:
1) F4U-1 DUR not corrected from 108 to 54
2) Ki-83 given proper 9.1 NM DUR calculation - 57 (was 88)
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:14 pm
by Fletcher
Can I update this Nikmod variant in a game in progress ? (Refer :Scen 158 -Soviet Fleet+NikMod 8.0)
thanks in advance !
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:15 pm
by DD696
Don't we wish!!
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:42 pm
by Nikademus
afraid not. [:(]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:38 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Your mod sucks![:'(]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:51 pm
by Nikademus
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Your mod sucks![:'(]
I've heard CHS is quite popular actually.... [:'(]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 7:52 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Darrrr... Maybe I was talking about your so-called Nok-Mod...[:'(]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:02 pm
by Nikademus
I'm detecting a hostile attitude on your part. Regardless....this thread is not about NM. It's about CHS, with NM A2A only added in.
[:)]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:06 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Prove it! Show me at least three proper sources![:'(]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:28 pm
by Nikademus
prove what? that your the infamous SPAM KING....recently aprehended?
www.cnn.com
www.msnbc.com
www.foxnews.com
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:35 pm
by Helpless
Good news! Thanks Andrew and Nik! [&o]
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:00 pm
by Andrew Brown
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
Corrections made and sent to Andrew for uploading:
1) F4U-1 DUR not corrected from 108 to 54
2) Ki-83 given proper 9.1 NM DUR calculation - 57 (was 88)
The corrected scenarios are now available from my
website.
Andrew
RE: CHS 2.08 Nikmod variant updated
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 11:21 pm
by rockmedic109
Thanks Nik. I will change Ki-83 to 57.
Good job to Andrew and Nik. You don't get paid and still provide quicker support of you products than multi-million dollar companies whose job it is to provide support for their products.