Winters are too harsh
Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 6:48 pm
This game is simply amazing. there are a few minor details that need work.
It's November and I've got snow in East Texas and Blizzards in North Virginia. That should be rare in the dead of winter and unheard of in November.
Also, naval combat seems to be too much like land combat. Ships take damage, but never sink. I may be speaking ahead of myself, though. I've only had a few naval engagements.
Oh, and I'm not sure bombardment works. I've had Farragut bombard Fort Clark with a full fleet and take 10 points of damage and give none, then Porter bombarded a garrison that didn't even have a battery and he also took 10 points of damage and gave none.
Aside from that, this is a very remarkable game. I honestly didn't think a strategic game of the Civil War was possible, but this one is really looking good so far. I'm very surprised at how well the economic structure is holding up - that was the part I thought would be impossible, but, by George, it's working so far.
It's November and I've got snow in East Texas and Blizzards in North Virginia. That should be rare in the dead of winter and unheard of in November.
Also, naval combat seems to be too much like land combat. Ships take damage, but never sink. I may be speaking ahead of myself, though. I've only had a few naval engagements.
Oh, and I'm not sure bombardment works. I've had Farragut bombard Fort Clark with a full fleet and take 10 points of damage and give none, then Porter bombarded a garrison that didn't even have a battery and he also took 10 points of damage and gave none.
Aside from that, this is a very remarkable game. I honestly didn't think a strategic game of the Civil War was possible, but this one is really looking good so far. I'm very surprised at how well the economic structure is holding up - that was the part I thought would be impossible, but, by George, it's working so far.