Page 1 of 3

Carrier Force

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:59 pm
by SvenNyqvist
Is there any developement in sight??

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:25 pm
by rogueusmc
General discussion forum might get a better response...

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:02 pm
by decaro
C@W is out, but it's long on interface and short on scenarios.
Hopefully a series of patches will fix the latter.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 5:36 pm
by tocaff
Nope, he said Carrier Force which is a game under development.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 6:11 pm
by decaro
CF, aka UV deluxe, etc. I know C@W and CF are two different games, but some of us went to C@W in the mean time.

Don't hold your breath re CF's release.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:16 pm
by tocaff
It's not a question of holding your breathe because rushing it would only disappoint the buyers quality wise.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:21 pm
by decaro
Todd, CF isn't even listed under the "under development" part of the Matrix foums! That's unusual, considering the body of the game -- the UV engine -- is already developed.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:27 pm
by SvenNyqvist
Perhaps the developer has some comments. There seems to beta testing in progress if I remember correctly.

In the early days I used Burning Steel II & III and I also have the first version of Carrier at war. I must admit that I am not using UV for the moment (WIPT & WPO are sufficient).

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:22 pm
by Sequoia
Does any one know if they intend to give us more detailed control over carrier operations in CF?

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:49 pm
by SvenNyqvist
My understanding was that it will be an UV which switch to tactical when forces attack each other. There was a hint in that direction somewhere in a forum.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:11 am
by Mike Wood
alpha testing
ORIGINAL: SvenNyqvist

Perhaps the developer has some comments. There seems to beta testing in progress if I remember correctly.

In the early days I used Burning Steel II & III and I also have the first version of Carrier at war. I must admit that I am not using UV for the moment (WIPT & WPO are sufficient).

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:12 am
by Mike Wood
yes. that is the point of the game
ORIGINAL: Sequoia

Does any one know if they intend to give us more detailed control over carrier operations in CF?

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:13 am
by Mike Wood
sort of
ORIGINAL: SvenNyqvist

My understanding was that it will be an UV which switch to tactical when forces attack each other. There was a hint in that direction somewhere in a forum.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:33 pm
by decaro
Here's the link to the CF developer's diary posted in a previous UV thread re new tactical carrier battles on the way:

tm.asp?m=1194230

You may have to scroll down this link to find what you're looking for.

I know of at least one beta-tester for CF; I guess he and the others are on hold 'til the alphas are done. But after the unfunded/untested 2.4 series of patches for UV, let Matrix alpha and beta test its heart out on this one. Besides, the competition -- CaW -- is already available and (hopefully) working on its first patch.

Mike Wood has the tersest posts I know; perhaps it's the side effect of a lifetime of writing compact code, i.e., the smaller the amount of code, the better the programmer.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:20 am
by Tankerace
As producer of Carrier Force, maybe I can answer a few questions. Carrier Force IS under development, and is moving forward. At this stage, as Mike said, it is still in Alpha testing, but is relatively playable right now. No release date is set right now, but I can confirm it is not vaporware.

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:38 am
by rogueusmc
Tanker...you still around?...you got your own board and you are being a stranger now!!![:D]

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:18 am
by decaro
As CF is under development, is there a reason why it's not listed under the "Coming soon/In development" section of the Matrix forums? There's even a posting for a possible Matrix remake of the venerable AoS, but to date there's no entry for CF.

Can you explain what "relatively playable" means?

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:17 pm
by tocaff
Maybe in an effort to get it right it won't be out soon.  Remember that everything is relative so your definition of soon is?

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:24 pm
by Terminus
ORIGINAL: Joe D.

As CF is under development, is there a reason why it's not listed under the "Coming soon/In development" section of the Matrix forums? There's even a posting for a possible Matrix remake of the venerable AoS, but to date there's no entry for CF.

Can you explain what "relatively playable" means?

I would suspect that he probably means that it doesn't crash every 9 seconds...

RE: Carrier Force

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:37 pm
by decaro
Matrix has a forum literally called "[Coming Soon and in Development]": if CF is "under development," it should be listed as such w/o fear of hindering game progress, or promising anything to anyone.

This CF thread reminds me of the threads posted after the lack of official info on how to apply the UV 2.5 comprehensive fix, i.e., is it a patch-over, is this the last patch, where is UV going, etc. This went on for many posts until someone from Matrix finally showed up.

So is there a moderator for this forum?