Midway's cloud cover wrong?
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:18 pm
I'm only 1/4 the way thru Shattered Sword and I found another apparent descrepancy between it and CaW's recreation of the historic Midway scenario. In additon to Nagumo having too many Zeros -- see my previous post -- I have found another problem w/cloud cover.
Re SS: Nagumo was coming out of a wx front that continued to follow the kido butai down from the NW, pushing scattered clouds into the area between Naguomo and Spruance, which made scouting difficult (esp. for the IJN as it was further hampered by the fact that most of its capital ship recon floatplanesplanes were actually spotters for naval artillery).
But in CaW, the only cloud cover between these two fleets is to the north and south of the Allies historical position; I have successfully used the clouds to the south to screen my launchs vs the KB if it doesn't steam NE and out of my range.
So if you're wondering why Spruance had better luck than you in this scenario, at least you know why; CaW's historical Midway scenario needs some fine-tuning for a more historical outcome.
Re SS: Nagumo was coming out of a wx front that continued to follow the kido butai down from the NW, pushing scattered clouds into the area between Naguomo and Spruance, which made scouting difficult (esp. for the IJN as it was further hampered by the fact that most of its capital ship recon floatplanesplanes were actually spotters for naval artillery).
But in CaW, the only cloud cover between these two fleets is to the north and south of the Allies historical position; I have successfully used the clouds to the south to screen my launchs vs the KB if it doesn't steam NE and out of my range.
So if you're wondering why Spruance had better luck than you in this scenario, at least you know why; CaW's historical Midway scenario needs some fine-tuning for a more historical outcome.