Aircraft eratta: RHS Microupdate x.71 issued
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:29 am
The date of the TBF-1 Avenger was challenged - and it is wrong in RHS - but correct in CHS. We were using the date of service delivery - Jan 42 - but this is very wrong in this case. Only a single aircraft was delivered that month - and it and later months production had to be returned to the factory. Service debut in PTO was the Battle of Mideay = 6/42. The number of machines was also excessive, and should be reduced to the rate of its successor model - the TBF-3 - that is 93 per month (down from 142). This is also very close to the CHS value of 90.
A number of cases where miscalculated maneuverability factors have been discovered during the ROC review. Even if we do not adopt the new data, we will back correct errors found in the current data set (actually we do this as it is discovered).
At some point it appears there will be a microupdate for aircraft. This will fold in all detected/reported eratta. At that point either we will adopt the new ROC data - or we will not - but we will correct the eratta in either case.
A number of cases where miscalculated maneuverability factors have been discovered during the ROC review. Even if we do not adopt the new data, we will back correct errors found in the current data set (actually we do this as it is discovered).
At some point it appears there will be a microupdate for aircraft. This will fold in all detected/reported eratta. At that point either we will adopt the new ROC data - or we will not - but we will correct the eratta in either case.