Nation X's HQ leading Nation Y's troops...?
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:36 am
Hi all!
Ran across a situation while playing the CP, that I think might in reality be a bit unhistorical.
I was trying to deal with those pesky Serbs once and for all, and the Austria-Hungarians and the CP-allied Bulgarians had `em surrounded. But while the Bulgarian HQ unit had no Offensive Points to keep his troops moving, the two AH HQs in the area had one Offensive Point apiece. So, I sent one of the AH HQs to the Bulgarians, and used an Offensive Point from a Austrian-Hungarian HQ to get the Bulgarian troops to engage the Serbs.
Now, this seems a little flawed and unhistorical to me.
Shouldn't there be some issues with one nation's HQ leading another nation's troops? Language barriers and such? And what about nations that have some bad blood in their past? For example, would Bulgarian troops take kindly to a Turkish leader pushing them into battle? What about a Italian leading French troops? etc, etc.
Thoughts?
//TB
Ran across a situation while playing the CP, that I think might in reality be a bit unhistorical.
I was trying to deal with those pesky Serbs once and for all, and the Austria-Hungarians and the CP-allied Bulgarians had `em surrounded. But while the Bulgarian HQ unit had no Offensive Points to keep his troops moving, the two AH HQs in the area had one Offensive Point apiece. So, I sent one of the AH HQs to the Bulgarians, and used an Offensive Point from a Austrian-Hungarian HQ to get the Bulgarian troops to engage the Serbs.
Now, this seems a little flawed and unhistorical to me.
Shouldn't there be some issues with one nation's HQ leading another nation's troops? Language barriers and such? And what about nations that have some bad blood in their past? For example, would Bulgarian troops take kindly to a Turkish leader pushing them into battle? What about a Italian leading French troops? etc, etc.
Thoughts?
//TB