Just a couple of things that I've been wondering...
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:11 pm
Why does the fictitious draft always include a hitter and a pitcher who around 30 years old and major league ready? And why are there so many 30-something scrubs available at the same time? I understand the need for scrubs but it seems to be they should be ages 17-23.
Am I alone in thinking that the draft is almost always very pitching-heavy? If you're routinely choosing in one of the last slots, you will almost never see a positional prospect with a 60 in contact or power. However, it seems that I can find quality pitching prospects all the way through the draft. I'm just finding it very hard to develop any of my own positional players.
I'm in year 14 of a 2004 Replay association and there are only 20 or so positional players in the entire league with contact ratings of over 70. Yet almost every team has 6-7 pitchers with stuff ratings higher than 70. At the same time, the association is still dominated by the offense. It's kinda strange.
Am I alone in thinking that the draft is almost always very pitching-heavy? If you're routinely choosing in one of the last slots, you will almost never see a positional prospect with a 60 in contact or power. However, it seems that I can find quality pitching prospects all the way through the draft. I'm just finding it very hard to develop any of my own positional players.
I'm in year 14 of a 2004 Replay association and there are only 20 or so positional players in the entire league with contact ratings of over 70. Yet almost every team has 6-7 pitchers with stuff ratings higher than 70. At the same time, the association is still dominated by the offense. It's kinda strange.