Mansouria Garrison
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:56 pm
If Units from China Area Army are moved into Mansouria, will this then have a effect on Mansuko Garrison, or is it only Kwutang Area Army Units who will have effect on this?
ORIGINAL: Japan
If Units from China Area Army are moved into Mansouria, will this then have a effect on Mansuko Garrison, or is it only Kwutang Area Army Units who will have effect on this?
ORIGINAL: jumper
I think it doesn´t matter what HQ LCU have. Whatever is in Manchuria, its AV is added to the total garrison value. So you can boost it by China units for example if your HRs allows you to do so.
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: jumper
I think it doesn´t matter what HQ LCU have. Whatever is in Manchuria, its AV is added to the total garrison value. So you can boost it by China units for example if your HRs allows you to do so.
i don't think this is true (witnessed by the numerous house rules against marching LCUs from Manchuria to China) - but i will check.
ORIGINAL: castor troy
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: jumper
I think it doesn´t matter what HQ LCU have. Whatever is in Manchuria, its AV is added to the total garrison value. So you can boost it by China units for example if your HRs allows you to do so.
i don't think this is true (witnessed by the numerous house rules against marching LCUs from Manchuria to China) - but i will check.
It´s doesn´t matter what HQ the unit is assigned to! Every unit in the Manchurian area counts! IIRC you can even move your home island divisions to the base far in the North and they count... [8|]
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
As for the house rules, apparently they are designed to keep things in theater rather than preventing abuse of garrison values.
ORIGINAL: jumper
I have just moved a good part of China Army to Manchuria and the garrison AV jumped from 8500 to 13000 as soon as my army under china command HQ crossed the border..
ORIGINAL: TenChiMato
In the recent reallocation of some Kwantung units I did (basically moving some units to South Korea for future reassignment but no change of HQ yet), I noticed that the total AV dropped while I had some LCUs in transit between bases in Mandchuria and Korea. Looks like it was the total AV of Kwantung HQ units in Kwantung HQ bases. Then again many units start In Mandchuria far away from some bases so strange indeed even when taking into account the temporary loss of AV due to the lack of support while the units moved away from corps HQ or airbases support units. Had to cancel several moves as the total AV suddenly dropped very very close to the Soviet activation value.
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: TenChiMato
In the recent reallocation of some Kwantung units I did (basically moving some units to South Korea for future reassignment but no change of HQ yet), I noticed that the total AV dropped while I had some LCUs in transit between bases in Mandchuria and Korea. Looks like it was the total AV of Kwantung HQ units in Kwantung HQ bases. Then again many units start In Mandchuria far away from some bases so strange indeed even when taking into account the temporary loss of AV due to the lack of support while the units moved away from corps HQ or airbases support units. Had to cancel several moves as the total AV suddenly dropped very very close to the Soviet activation value.
According to other folk, bases don't have to be assigned to Kwantung HQ - apparently just in the right quadrant (they can even be in N. Japan) - the observation about them being in bases is interesting, though.
ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: TenChiMato
In the recent reallocation of some Kwantung units I did (basically moving some units to South Korea for future reassignment but no change of HQ yet), I noticed that the total AV dropped while I had some LCUs in transit between bases in Mandchuria and Korea. Looks like it was the total AV of Kwantung HQ units in Kwantung HQ bases. Then again many units start In Mandchuria far away from some bases so strange indeed even when taking into account the temporary loss of AV due to the lack of support while the units moved away from corps HQ or airbases support units. Had to cancel several moves as the total AV suddenly dropped very very close to the Soviet activation value.
According to other folk, bases don't have to be assigned to Kwantung HQ - apparently just in the right quadrant (they can even be in N. Japan) - the observation about them being in bases is interesting, though.
Sorry I'm late to this party.
The Manchurian Garrison is a "box" defined by four hexes. I've posted these four hexes before .. don't have them memorized ... I can go look them up again if needed .. but I am sure that the "Manchurian Garrison" is defined as a box. Any Japanese side unit in this box will count. The box include part of Hokkaido but the Southern tip of Korea.
The HQ assignment of unit in this box does not matter.
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
According to other folk, bases don't have to be assigned to Kwantung HQ - apparently just in the right quadrant (they can even be in N. Japan) - the observation about them being in bases is interesting, though.
Sorry I'm late to this party.
The Manchurian Garrison is a "box" defined by four hexes. I've posted these four hexes before .. don't have them memorized ... I can go look them up again if needed .. but I am sure that the "Manchurian Garrison" is defined as a box. Any Japanese side unit in this box will count. The box include part of Hokkaido but the Southern tip of Korea.
The HQ assignment of unit in this box does not matter.
After thinking about it... i suspect the decrease in "Machurian Garrison" value when your units were on the road may well have been in supply issues. If a unit has lots of supplies, it functions well for most purposes... if supply levels are down even if little bit, interesting things start to happen (i.e. - check victory point values for bases in consecutive turns - the number of bases may be the same, but VP values change (sometimes radically) from turn to turn)... i suspect the garrison value for a unit might drop if not completely supplied.
ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
OK, went and looked up the boundaries of this box.
(56,37) is lower left.
(71,37) is lower right.
North edge of map is north boundary.
And hex rows 56 and 71 are the east and west edges.
And hex row 37 is lower edge.
Any Japanese unit on or inside this box is defined to be in the Manchuko garrision, any Japanese unit outside this box is not in the Manchuko garrison. There are no other qualifiers on whether you are in or out of the Manchuko garrison, not supply, not HQ, nothing, just whether you are inside this box or not.
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: jwilkerson
OK, went and looked up the boundaries of this box.
(56,37) is lower left.
(71,37) is lower right.
North edge of map is north boundary.
And hex rows 56 and 71 are the east and west edges.
And hex row 37 is lower edge.
Any Japanese unit on or inside this box is defined to be in the Manchuko garrision, any Japanese unit outside this box is not in the Manchuko garrison. There are no other qualifiers on whether you are in or out of the Manchuko garrison, not supply, not HQ, nothing, just whether you are inside this box or not.
i know there have been several discussions in the past about the garrison value varying fairly radically - and in one case (a while back) this resulted in an unexpected Soviet activation... if there are no qualifiers, why does the garrison value vary? (or has that been fixed???) [&:]