Page 1 of 1

RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:51 pm
by Buck Beach
Latest file received with file date of 1/7/2008 still shows Port Heiden (shown as Port Hayden) staffed with the Alaska Defense Command and supporting units. A/c at Anchorage were changed as reported. The subject changes to AIO & latest CAIO seemed to be OK but I didn't try to track any other changes except the staffing shuffle and the a/c changes.

RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:43 am
by el cid again
There is some sort of confusion here. It is not that way in any copy at source. If you cannot redownload I can retransmit - and if I do it will (must) contain a few more eratta which have been addressed. Please advise.


RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:52 pm
by Buck Beach
I will e-mail you back the attachment to my e-mail and maybe this help clear up what is happening.

Edit: Well I redownloaded the attachment the subject file and applied it, Port Hayden is still there and staffed. I have sent the attachment back for your verification.

RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:48 pm
by el cid again
If you don't have the right files

I must re upload

Since I must

I will issue 7.7894 with additional eratta and some enhancements:

2 RTAF minor airfield units with leaders

U-168 gets commander Helmuth Pich (Kapitan Lt)

RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:15 am
by m10bob
Info only, in RHSCVO 7.7893 Port Rupert CD fort unit(static) appears at Frisco 6/42 and cannot be moved to Port Rupert Canada..

RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:57 pm
by el cid again
This is confirmed.

It is also a mystery:

the slot is not used in stock - is used for a Panama unit in CHS - and it IS PROPERLY set in RHS to appear at Prince Rupert.

Any clue WHY it does not appear at the right place????

RE: RHSCVO 7.7893

Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:48 pm
by el cid again
Does not matter: I was able to go to an open slot (as in stock) - by combineing the unit with the CA/RCAF Base Fort.