Page 1 of 1

Profiles / Play book Suggestion

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:30 am
by hack153
if we could make a group and not add plays...but we set the pass:run ratio and plays are pulled from the playbook play list that are not marked special situation. this would save a ton of work.

RE: Profiles / Play book Suggestion

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:05 am
by Marauders
Version 2.2 should allow the ability to copy plays to other groups, so get one large group of plays set up for generic situations, move them over, and set the pass/run for that situation.
 

RE: Profiles / Play book Suggestion

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:42 am
by hack153
ORIGINAL: Marauders

Version 2.2 should allow the ability to copy plays to other groups, so get one large group of plays set up for generic situations, move them over, and set the pass/run for that situation.

this is what keeps me interested in the game. game makers listening to suggestions! thanks!

what exact changes are being made to the profile / groups? i'm just wondering how much time i want to put into making more profiles and groups.

one other suggestion...if you could choose multiple options while creating a group. (ex. Dn 1-3, and Dn 4-6 or minutes remainind 1-3, and 4-5)

RE: Profiles / Play book Suggestion

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:24 pm
by Marauders
one other suggestion...if you could choose multiple options while creating a group. (ex. Dn 1-3, and Dn 4-6 or minutes remainind 1-3, and 4-5)
 
I don't think that combined downs will make it into the game like that, but David has already stated that he will attempt to make defined gameplan situations exclusive, and one may copy from down to down.
 
One could also use the ALL command, but that could bring other plays in if used for downs, so I would advise against it.
 
Dn 4-6
 
 
Are you hacking the game again? [;)]

RE: Profiles / Play book Suggestion

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 6:59 pm
by Marauders
if we could make a group and not add plays...but we set the pass:run ratio and plays are pulled from the playbook play list that are not marked special situation. this would save a ton of work.
 
Update: we are testing this as a procedure.