tester volunteers
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:23 pm
Any volunteers for testing, preferably old testers with the NDA signed and all that?
I'd like proactive testing. By this I mean, don't just play the game but actually proactively exercise some of the changes and look for problems. Although I think I do a pretty good job testing on my own, I've made enough changes that I can see the potential for problems I could miss.
I fixed the issue with the date of victory evaluation, but it was pretty intertwined with some less than optimal code sequencing. It was difficult to extricate it correctly while leaving the Continue Game options working. In the process, I also found and fixed what appeared to be a long-standing bug with the WA v Soviet continuation (doesn't the VP threshold display incorrectly for everyone if you get to WA v Sov via continuation, as opposed to directly via the 1946 scenario?).
There are numerous other things that are worthy of a little testing.
I'd like proactive testing. By this I mean, don't just play the game but actually proactively exercise some of the changes and look for problems. Although I think I do a pretty good job testing on my own, I've made enough changes that I can see the potential for problems I could miss.
I fixed the issue with the date of victory evaluation, but it was pretty intertwined with some less than optimal code sequencing. It was difficult to extricate it correctly while leaving the Continue Game options working. In the process, I also found and fixed what appeared to be a long-standing bug with the WA v Soviet continuation (doesn't the VP threshold display incorrectly for everyone if you get to WA v Sov via continuation, as opposed to directly via the 1946 scenario?).
There are numerous other things that are worthy of a little testing.