Matrix Games Forums

ORIGINAL: Hasardeur

Hallo,

which szenarios can we expect and how many turns will it have ?

when can we expect the release of the game ? (hopefully very soon ! )

Regards

ORIGINAL: Hasardeur

One scenario with 16 turns ? Well, this is not much ! People who will buy the game will have to hope for user made scenarios - something, which have not worked with Battlefront.

This is a serious reason not to buy the game before some more scenarios are relesased !

Greats

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

This is a game designed and balanced by a veteran team of designers, with an outstanding track record of quality. Such games are not exactly a dime a dozen in the computer wargaming world.

Regards,

- Erik

ORIGINAL: HercMighty

Yup getting worse, now you only get 1 scenario. Really with the variants you still only get one scenario you just get to play it differently.

No Thanks.

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Ok, I'm disappointed to see these comments. Let me ask you wargamers a question. If you saw a board game tomorrow that covered the 2nd Battle of Kharkov in detail and with excellent research and great play balance (along with 10 "variants") would you consider buying it? My guess is that the answer is yes. Yet with computer wargames, that's not enough?

I think a key point to be made in SSG's favor is that they really do their research and play the heck out of these battles before releasing them. You can take quantity over quality, but how many other scenarios have you played where it was clear the designers did not do their research or did not play through from both sides for balance or both?

Quite simply, if you want the best operational depiction of the 2nd Battle of Kharkov, along with a bunch of variants and the best rules from Decisive Battles as well as Battlefront, this is the game to get. If you also want a full new editor and an engine that supports both battalion and regimental scales, this is the game to get.

This is a game designed and balanced by a veteran team of designers, with an outstanding track record of quality. Such games are not exactly a dime a dozen in the computer wargaming world.

Regards,

- Erik

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

I think a key point to be made in SSG's favor is that they really do their research and play the heck out of these battles before releasing them. You can take quantity over quality, but how many other scenarios have you played where it was clear the designers did not do their research or did not play through from both sides for balance or both?

ORIGINAL: HercMighty
And personally I think this is where you went wrong. Your pushing this on us. Where we have asked for variety, you have gone the opposite direction. You try to mask this with the mystery variant thing but sorry I don't see it that way. So you've made your decision and maybe it will work out, but for me this is where my support of these games end.

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Excuse me, but could you show me where Matrix is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to buy this or any other game? Just curious...[8|]

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

If you saw a board game tomorrow that covered the 2nd Battle of Kharkov in detail and with excellent research and great play balance (along with 10 "variants") would you consider buying it? My guess is that the answer is yes. Yet with computer wargames, that's not enough?

Regards,

- Erik