Page 1 of 1

Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:39 am
by Chris21wen
Anybody know why the Reppu is classified as a Fighter and not a Fighter bomber? It's more manouverable, faster etc thean the Zeke but it can carry as much load Actually what determines when any plane is a F or FB?

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:51 am
by Feinder
-F-

Image

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:13 pm
by Shark7
ORIGINAL: Feinder

-F-

Image

Heads I win, tails you lose. [;)]

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 4:49 pm
by Mike Solli
[:D]

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 8:14 pm
by dennishe
Is there a difference in the game between a fighter and a fighterbomber except for that you find them in different columns?

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:11 pm
by Feinder
I believe that a fighter-bomber set to nav attack (regardless of altitude) will drop down to 100' to strafe Barges and PTs if they present at targets of opportunity.  Wherease (pure) fighters must specifically be set to 100' if you want them to attack Barges and PTs.
 
-F-

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:24 am
by Hornblower
Also, if i recall the rules correctly, fighter bombers will not engage in a dogfight if they encounter cap.

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:03 am
by okami
ORIGINAL: Hornblower

Also, if i recall the rules correctly, fighter bombers will not engage in a dogfight if they encounter cap.
Only of set to bomb otherwise they act as a fighter in every respect.

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:09 am
by castor troy
ORIGINAL: Feinder

I believe that a fighter-bomber set to nav attack (regardless of altitude) will drop down to 100' to strafe Barges and PTs if they present at targets of opportunity.  Wherease (pure) fighters must specifically be set to 100' if you want them to attack Barges and PTs.

-F-


never seen that but if you say it... [;)]

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:14 pm
by Grell
Yea that's what I thought.

Regards,

Greg

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:00 pm
by Shark7
ORIGINAL: Feinder

I believe that a fighter-bomber set to nav attack (regardless of altitude) will drop down to 100' to strafe Barges and PTs if they present at targets of opportunity.  Wherease (pure) fighters must specifically be set to 100' if you want them to attack Barges and PTs.

-F-

Actually in my PBEM, my fighter-bombers are set to 10000 altitude and dropping 250 lbs bombs on barges. No strafing at all.

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 3:24 pm
by timtom
AFAIK, the fighter/fighter-bomber distinction is purely an AI tool to help it prioritise regarding mission selection.

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 7:34 pm
by engineer
I have upgraded the AVG to P-38Gs FB.  They're flying naval missions in stock, and they seem to be dropping to 2000 feet to release their bombs like dive bombers!  They're based in Wuchow and it's made getting shipping into and out of Canton and HK hell for the AI.  Is this some 80+ experience thing?
 
 
 
 

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 9:09 pm
by hvymtl13
No they semi-dive bomb. Other aircraft do this same tactic when bombing.
 
The only info I can find on what constitutes classification as a F/B is that it performs Close air support. An Attack aircraft with fighter abilities also. The US Army designated all of it's Fighters as P aircraft. Meaning Pursuit.
The word "fighter" did not become the official British term for a single seat fighter until after the First World War. In the RFC/RAF such aircraft continued to be called "scouts" into the early 1920s. The U.S. Army called their fighters "pursuit" aircraft (reflected by their designation in the "P" series) from 1916 until the late 1940s. In the French and German languages the term used (and still in use) literally means "hunter". This has been followed in most other languages, an exception being Russian, in which the fighter is called "èñòðåáèòåëü" (pronounced "istrebitel") which is literally "exterminator".

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:53 pm
by Yamato hugger
Here you are Timtom.

Image

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:11 pm
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: engineer

I have upgraded the AVG to P-38Gs FB.  They're flying naval missions in stock, and they seem to be dropping to 2000 feet to release their bombs like dive bombers!  They're based in Wuchow and it's made getting shipping into and out of Canton and HK hell for the AI.  Is this some 80+ experience thing?




How do you assign a FB to a F unit? [&:]

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 7:20 pm
by Feinder
Some units (esp with PDU on), can cross over between F and FB.  Like the Australian Throwaways (FB), can sometimes upgrade to Kitty I and Hurri IIb (depending on the scenario).  Often times tho, once you change the path, the former route is closed.
 
-F-

RE: Fighter or Fighter Bomber

Posted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:00 pm
by Mike Solli
Heh, learned something new.......again.