Page 1 of 2
Modified OOB set
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 1:57 am
by Guderian
I have created a set of modified OOB's, with most mistakes/bugs corrected, and a few new additions. Drop a line here if you wish to get a copy.
Cheers all.
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:17 am
by troopie
Is this the same as your last set. If not e-mail me a copy asseblief.
Dankie,
troopie
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:26 am
by Schrullenhaft
Hey... I'm lazy... email me a copy please.
ian_straw@hotmail.com
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:37 am
by Wild Bill
I would love to see your handiwork, Gud. Put me down please (on your list, that is

)...Wild Bill
------------------
In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Coordinator, Scenario Design
Matrix Games
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:54 am
by David Heath
Hey
Count me in to I would love to see what you have done.
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 7:24 am
by Tankhead
Count me in I in love to see what you have done.
Tankhead
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 9:34 am
by Six-pk
Me to!
Six
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 1:56 pm
by grockall
A copy would be very much appreciated.
Grockall
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 5:03 pm
by ncpanther
I would love a copy. Thanks!
------------------
NC
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 5:05 pm
by ncpanther
I would love a copy. Thanks!
------------------
NC
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 5:22 pm
by talon
Well I also would like to get a copy Guderian
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:08 pm
by Charles22
Guderian: While perusing some OOB's I noticed one particular tank had a slope of 90 degrees. Can't pin it down however, sorry. Must have been either Russian, German or Polish. I wonder if you caught that.
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:15 pm
by Voriax
Originally posted by Charles22:
Guderian: While perusing some OOB's I noticed one particular tank had a slope of 90 degrees. Can't pin it down however, sorry. Must have been either Russian, German or Polish. I wonder if you caught that.
What a slope
It's German StuG IIIf/8, rear hull slope 90 degrees. Might change it to the same as the regular IIIf, 23 deg.
Voriax
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 6:21 pm
by Charles22
I think there were some other discrepancies between those two of the SGIII series which I found interesting. I'm not saying what I saw was incorrect, but it didn't seem entirely logical as I imagined that the SGIIIG would have the edge all around. I also noticed that the PZIVD has I believe a 5 higher amount of AP rounds than the PZIVC. That's fairly crucial for that part of the German effort. I definitely hesitate to upgarde a PZIVC to a PZIVD, just becasue of slightly more armor, but the round increase makes more tempting (Do you wait till the PZIVE comes out?).
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 8:26 pm
by Omar.N.Bradley
Hi Guderian,
I would also like to have a copy if you have the time.
Omar.N.Bradley
------------------
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 9:29 pm
by Guderian
Originally posted by Charles22:
Guderian: While perusing some OOB's I noticed one particular tank had a slope of 90 degrees. Can't pin it down however, sorry. Must have been either Russian, German or Polish. I wonder if you caught that.
No, i didn't

. I worked mostly on infantry and AT-guns this time, major revision of tanks will come with ver 3.0. I'm going to do the dirty job of checking if all the Shermans etc have the same stats in each nation - i remember the good old bug (killed in Spww2) of US Sherms having 2 poinst armor more then Brit/Canadian ones.
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 10:05 pm
by talon
Considering the thing with the ammo Charles I would say that the erliest versions of the greman tanks III and IV had the biggest amont of ammo and this was lowered thereafter to alow the higher amor . Ammo had to be reduced so that the weight of the tank didn´t grow to much
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2000 11:55 pm
by Charles22
I'm not saying that latter versions having more ammo is bad, but on the other hand, you have to know ALL the details to really know whether a latter version would naturally have less ammo instead of more, afterall, if the vehicle ended up pulling with more power in the newer model, adding more ammo may had been part of the equation of taking advantage of that extra power.
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2000 12:18 am
by Panther
Ammo carrying capacity is a very subjective thing. Many tanks would carry extra ammo when going in to battle. This includes holding rounds in their hands as well as stashing rounds every where they could beyond the official numbers. Or at times the oppisite would be true then there was very little ammo.
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2000 12:32 am
by Voriax
Originally posted by talon:
Considering the thing with the ammo Charles I would say that the erliest versions of the greman tanks III and IV had the biggest amont of ammo and this was lowered thereafter to alow the higher amor . Ammo had to be reduced so that the weight of the tank didn´t grow to much
Consider also that the later versions tended to be upgunned. Early PzIII's had 37mm guns, then came the short 50mm with a larger gun itself and larger rounds. Then came long 50mm gun and again new kind of ammo (longer casings I think) so again you had to redesign ammo racks. But as there is only so much space in a tank you ended up having less ammo each time you upgunned the design.
Voriax