Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 2:08 pm
Title says it all. I'm interested in a multiplayer WWIII or 2-player Barbarossa.
Matrix Games Forums
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Page 1 of 2
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 6:25 pm
I would like to join WWIII. But dont have time for another Barbarossa1vs1.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:21 pm
Still LF opponent(s) for pretty much any multiplayer or 2 player scenario.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:38 pm
We need a Japan player for Waw Ver k.... wanna join?
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 12:55 pm
Me and jjdenver are looking for a couple of players for a barbarossa game, any takers?
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:47 am
Would prefer WWIII as I am already doing two games of Op Barbarossa, but in case you have closed search for WWIII-players I would like to join Barbarossa.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 4:41 pm
I'll play WWIII, I might be fodder though since I've only played against the AI.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Mon May 18, 2009 7:15 pm
Pls PM me your email and post which side you'd prefer in WWIII and if we have enough we can play.
I'd prefer in order:
US
USSR
EU
PDRC
I'd prefer in order:
US
USSR
EU
PDRC
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 12:26 am
My prefs:
PDRC
NATO
USSR
US
PDRC
NATO
USSR
US
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 10:36 am
PDRC
USSR
NATO
USA
I hope Rufus is not looking for revenge
USSR
NATO
USA
I hope Rufus is not looking for revenge
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 3:02 pm
I will take any side that is opposite to hatemf90 [:'(]
Ok, serious now:
US or NATO would be fine.
So, jj, we try to send these bloody communists to hell? [:D]
Could start tomorrow (Wednesday) evening (GMT+1)
Ok, serious now:
US or NATO would be fine.
So, jj, we try to send these bloody communists to hell? [:D]
Could start tomorrow (Wednesday) evening (GMT+1)
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:28 pm
Based on the opinions given I think these sides should work out fine:
PDRC: hatemf90
USSR: jjdenver
NATO: Jxai
US: RufusTFirefly
This gives everyone one of their top 2 choices - so works out great.
NATO does their turn first so Jxai can you start the game up? I'll email to everyone so we have each other's email addresses.
PDRC: hatemf90
USSR: jjdenver
NATO: Jxai
US: RufusTFirefly
This gives everyone one of their top 2 choices - so works out great.
NATO does their turn first so Jxai can you start the game up? I'll email to everyone so we have each other's email addresses.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 5:53 pm
Sounds good, I'll start it as soon as I get the email.
JH
JH
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:17 pm
First turn sent to jjdenver, NATO is shocked by the sudden build up of Communist troops and hastily rushes troops to the European front. Deep recon flights suggest a buildup of armored assets around Berlin. Brussels is concerned and orders massive changes in production. Artillery obstinently refuses to fire... (is that a bug?)
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 8:39 pm
No it just has a range of 1, so has to be right next to the target.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 9:11 pm
Oh boy...I hope I didn't tip my hand too much. That is...the hand that I haven't played this scenario before. Heh.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:23 pm
In this scenario you can build artillery (guns, rockets) with range = 1. And you can build long-range artillery (guns) with range = 2.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:44 pm
well, Rufus might have his revenge after all. Dont be surprised if you hear news of japan invading china [:'(]
Turn sent to US
Turn sent to US
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:05 pm
This game is dead or paused or ...?
In case it is dead I would like to start another one.
In case it is dead I would like to start another one.
RE: Anyone for WWIII (multiplayer) or Barbarossa (2-player)?
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:37 pm
ORIGINAL: RufusTFirefly
This game is dead or paused or ...?
In case it is dead I would like to start another one.
I'm not sure what happened. Someone stopped sending the turn. I was making an AAR. The last screenshots I have are from Turn 5 so that must have been the last turn that I was sent.
Here is a pic of Turkey, Europe, and Scandinavia
