The List

PureSim Baseball is the ultimate baseball fan's toy, with support for both casual and hardcore baseball fans.

Moderator: puresimmer

Post Reply
User avatar
Jabez54
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:55 am
Location: Los Lunas, NM

The List

Post by Jabez54 »

Hey Mates ...

Just a poll in regarding to the "List of 102": Should the MLB release the list in order to cleanse the mind of all and to be able to start fresh or keep it a secret?

If so, Should we not vote Rose, Shoeless, and others to the Hall of Fame due to their prowness on the field rather than off?

Tomas
Red Sox Fan since 1967
User avatar
Wrathchild
Posts: 817
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:09 pm
Location: Reading, PA
Contact:

RE: The List

Post by Wrathchild »

I believe that anyone should be eligible for the HoF as long as their actions didn't somehow give them an unfair advantage on the field.
J.G. Wrathchild, Manager, St. Louis Cardinals (1900-1906), Brooklyn Superbas (1907, 1908)
User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

RE: The List

Post by KG Erwin »

Is the phrase "conduct detrimental to baseball" still in use? Does anyone know exactly how it is defined?

By Wrathchild's definition, I'd have an easier time admitting Pete Rose and Joe Jackson into the HoF than I would any confirmed performance-enhancing drug user.
Image
User avatar
dneely
Posts: 207
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:03 am

RE: The List

Post by dneely »

I agree with KG on Shoeless Joe in particular I think he deserves to be in the Hall and should have been in years ago. I also think Pete has paid for his crimes in most respects and deserves his spot based on what he did between the lines.

Bonds, Sosa, McGwire and company....NO.
DNeely

PureSim Vet
Post Reply

Return to “PureSim Baseball”