Page 1 of 1
Is this intended?
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 4:00 pm
by Viking67
I have the Australian unit, 2/1st Ind Coy based at Kavieng, the 2/1st Ind Coy/1 based at Rabaul, and the 2/1st Ind Coy/2 based at Port Moresby. The Japanese land at Rabaul and take the base. All three sub units surrender!!!
This can't be right...
Is it a bug?
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:08 pm
by treespider
Probably not....do you have a save available for when it happens...not after...but the turn that generates the combat where they surrender?
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:19 am
by Viking67
Yes. How do I get it to you?
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:47 am
by treespider
PM sent
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:28 am
by Viking67
Sent it... Let me know what you think.
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:55 am
by treespider
Sorry could not replicate the report...however I did notice you were airlifting one the units. It completed the airlift out of kavieng this turn, so perhaps it is still present, but you overlooked where it might be.
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 4:25 am
by Viking67
I sent you the post save as well. Please take a look. I did see a message flash by that said the unit surrendered... but in all three or at least two locations, after the airlift?
Have you looked at the air replacements?
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:14 pm
by BigJ62
treespider can you send me the save(s)?
Viking67 can you post a screenshot of one the units that you believe should not have surrendered from the before save?
RE: Is this intended?
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 2:41 pm
by Viking67
Tree has the pre & post saved file.