Corrupt Save Again
Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2002 3:36 pm
I just finished the early attack on the Stalin Line, got a DV and a Knight's Cross. Continued straight on to "The Making of a Tiger Ace". As I started the scenario, the error "Unable to load oobxx" appeared. I am running all the latest patches.
I've had this happen before when my machine crashed, which is fair enough. But to have this happen when the game appears to be running fine is extremely frustrating, especially when the game prevents you from saving a "spare copy" unless you create backups externally.
I am a huge SP fan, and I have the utmost respect for the work that Matrix Games have put in on SP and the MCs. BUT, this problem has been around for some time, and each time it has been reported, the response has been "it'll get better in the next patch".
If I didn't regularly check these forums and know about creating backups, I would have been back to square one. Again. I don't want to sound like a whiner, but I believe this issue should have been dealt with as a priority, as it seriously impairs the functionality of what is, after all, a commercial product.
Even if the save mechanism of the megacampaigns became an option rather than the default, it would be a start. I really like the idea of having to live with your results and not going back to re-fight a scenario when you know where the enemy is deployed, but when the software has a known problem like this, I think it is counter-productive.
This is all meant as constructive criticism and I hope it comes over as such.
I've had this happen before when my machine crashed, which is fair enough. But to have this happen when the game appears to be running fine is extremely frustrating, especially when the game prevents you from saving a "spare copy" unless you create backups externally.
I am a huge SP fan, and I have the utmost respect for the work that Matrix Games have put in on SP and the MCs. BUT, this problem has been around for some time, and each time it has been reported, the response has been "it'll get better in the next patch".
If I didn't regularly check these forums and know about creating backups, I would have been back to square one. Again. I don't want to sound like a whiner, but I believe this issue should have been dealt with as a priority, as it seriously impairs the functionality of what is, after all, a commercial product.
Even if the save mechanism of the megacampaigns became an option rather than the default, it would be a start. I really like the idea of having to live with your results and not going back to re-fight a scenario when you know where the enemy is deployed, but when the software has a known problem like this, I think it is counter-productive.
This is all meant as constructive criticism and I hope it comes over as such.