Page 1 of 1
hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:48 pm
by MuguNiner
Hi,
I know that I have seen a post about this in the past, but was not successful in searching for it. So, here goes: can either the HQ Amphibious Force and HQ Amphibious Corps be used with a command and control ship ACG(?) for the amphibious attack advantage?
Thanks
RE: hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:29 pm
by khyberbill
The FORCE HQ loads onto the AGC. It looks to big, but it fits. This is the unit that will help you during your invasion.
RE: hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:22 pm
by engineer
It also helps that Turner was a heckuva ground force commander.
RE: hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:20 am
by MuguNiner
tanks!
Who was Turner?
RE: hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:43 am
by Balou
Richmond K. Turner: in 1942 he was sent to the Pacific war zone to take command of the Amphibious Force, South Pacific Force. Helped plan and execute the conquest of enemy positions in the south, central and western Pacific. Would have commanded the amphibious component of the invasion of Japan.
RE: hq amphibious force vs corps
Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:15 pm
by MuguNiner
Thank you sir. I know about Howlin Mad, but don't recall Turner. Don't know if they had the same job.