Page 1 of 1
USN Fubukis
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 10:43 pm
by dasboot1960
Yes USN Fubukis. This originated as an illuminated anchor at Legaspi, reporting as '2DD', but no ships were listed 'in port' and none could be added to a new TF. When the Japanese took Legaspi, I recieved two TFs - one surface combat, one air combat - each with one Fubuki(III); specifically Inazuma, and Iazuchi. I haven't been able to determine whether these should be active with the IJN or not. My email opponent has responded once that they were not, and once that they were 'reported moving around Mindanao' (so Guberman, that's why I wanted a coherent answer) In any case, I move them to Butuan and dispanded. I am now in a similar situation to the start - 2DDs reporting, but can't access them or form TFs, I'll post again when the Japanese summon the moxy to take Butuan.
This is not a complaint - I've been waiting a long time, there is almost too much detail here, the least I could say is this is the greatest effort anyone has ever made at covering this conflict with a computer game.
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:09 pm
by madgamer2
Hang around for awhile there are those control and micro management types who dominate this forum who will not be happy till they can control every man, gun, tank, ship, sailor,......well you get the picture. One of my favorite things is to see how far Matrix can and is willing to go with or without the help of the many players who brought about the release of AE. I am not sure why the price is so high as much of the work was done by players or staff members on there time. I can't wait to see where things go after they get AE on its feet, which I am sure they will.
good sailing and welcome to the rest of your life as a player of AE. It not to late you can still uninstall it,,,nsw it to late already LOL
Madgamer
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:48 pm
by pompack
Love that green button
Now, hopefully someone can help the boot with his problem
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:44 pm
by Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: dasboot
Yes USN Fubukis. This originated as an illuminated anchor at Legaspi, reporting as '2DD', but no ships were listed 'in port' and none could be added to a new TF. When the Japanese took Legaspi, I recieved two TFs - one surface combat, one air combat - each with one Fubuki(III); specifically Inazuma, and Iazuchi. I haven't been able to determine whether these should be active with the IJN or not. My email opponent has responded once that they were not, and once that they were 'reported moving around Mindanao' (so Guberman, that's why I wanted a coherent answer) In any case, I move them to Butuan and dispanded. I am now in a similar situation to the start - 2DDs reporting, but can't access them or form TFs, I'll post again when the Japanese summon the moxy to take Butuan.
This is not a complaint - I've been waiting a long time, there is almost too much detail here, the least I could say is this is the greatest effort anyone has ever made at covering this conflict with a computer game.
If you are able to grab a save just before this happens, please post it on the Tech Support thread.
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:08 am
by dasboot1960
Hi Mr. Bowen
I will try and coordinate with My IJ PBEM opponent to provide you a save file immediately prior to his taking Butuan. Please advise if this is NOT what you are asking for
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:38 am
by Mr. Guberman
thanx, DasBoot...so many DDs, I could not help but loose two of them.
but mad gamer...are you fu$ed up? or worse, flaunt on the boards here cat..do it...are you just trying to advertise yourself...as being a dumb shi*t? I believe so... how about canning it...I believe most everyone would appreciate that...PM me when you want to rant, I'll call your bluff., and call you a dumbsh*t..just do it...so you do not embarrass youself so publically...you can embarass yourself through PM...how about that?
...dare you...
Cheers
Curt
RE: USN Fubukis
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:42 am
by dasboot1960
ehhh, Gubi send me a turn (I boitched about him on "the thread")