FOW for friendly forces + unreported ship sunk
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:28 pm
This save file and reports has two problems reported on general discussion.
(a) Losses of friendly forces is inaccurate/unreported on combat reports. For example, only O-47A destroyed that were reported is:
" O-47A: 3 destroyed on ground"
when in fact the Intelligence reports that 6 O-47A have been destroyed in the ground. By comparing the stock Dec 7 scenario against the Dec 8 game, the O-47A losses are accounted this way:
2nd OS at Clark Field changed from 10 ready, 2 damaged (Dec 7) to 10 ready, 1 damaged (Dec 8) --> 1 loss on ground
86th OS at Pearl Harbor changed from 8 ready (Dec 7) to 1 ready, 2 damaged (Dec 8) --> 5 losses on ground
So the Intel report is right on 6 O-47A losses, while the Combat Report listed the O-47A losses at Pearl Harbor incorrectly and didn't list the losses at Clark Field at all.
(b) Sinking/damage of friendly ships is unreported on combat reports. For example, AMc Condor just list at "AMc Condor sinks", but never says why on any combat report.
Thanks!
fbs
(a) Losses of friendly forces is inaccurate/unreported on combat reports. For example, only O-47A destroyed that were reported is:
" O-47A: 3 destroyed on ground"
when in fact the Intelligence reports that 6 O-47A have been destroyed in the ground. By comparing the stock Dec 7 scenario against the Dec 8 game, the O-47A losses are accounted this way:
2nd OS at Clark Field changed from 10 ready, 2 damaged (Dec 7) to 10 ready, 1 damaged (Dec 8) --> 1 loss on ground
86th OS at Pearl Harbor changed from 8 ready (Dec 7) to 1 ready, 2 damaged (Dec 8) --> 5 losses on ground
So the Intel report is right on 6 O-47A losses, while the Combat Report listed the O-47A losses at Pearl Harbor incorrectly and didn't list the losses at Clark Field at all.
(b) Sinking/damage of friendly ships is unreported on combat reports. For example, AMc Condor just list at "AMc Condor sinks", but never says why on any combat report.
Thanks!
fbs