Page 1 of 2
CV Stacking
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:51 pm
by P.Hausser
Can somone comfirm the CV Task Force Stacking Limitations to be:
Japan - 200 CV Planes (max) pr Task Force / 41-44
US - 100 CV Planes (max) pr Task Force /42
US - 150 CV Planes (max) pr Task Force /43
US - 200 Planes (max) pr Task force /44+
(max = to avoid coordination penalty)
[8D]
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:19 am
by P.Hausser
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:01 am
by USSAmerica
Be careful with the term "disregard" around here. [:D]
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am
by AW1Steve
If anyone here dares to start a "Disregard thread " here , I will immediately punish him (and everyone else) by starting a "geezer thread". So there!!! [:D][:D][:D]
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:07 pm
by Grollub
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
If anyone here dares to start a "Disregard thread " here , I will immediately punish him (and everyone else) by starting a "geezer thread". So there!!! [:D][:D][:D]
The "Disregard" thread yes ... That has to be one of sickest and most hilarious threads that's shown up in the forums ever.
[Lost in fond memories] [:D]
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:55 pm
by tocaff
So has this thread become a...oh never mind.
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:14 pm
by Tophat1815
oh well then,just disregard this aborted response..................[8D]
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:57 pm
by Nomad
Are we disregarding this thread? If so, then disregard this post also.
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 5:37 pm
by Chickenboy
Nomad: I *cannot* disregard your avatar, an integral part of your post.
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:27 pm
by Knavey
Uh oh...here we go again.
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:52 pm
by thegreatwent
Here we go with what, I wasn't paying attention...
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:52 am
by El Savior
I have somehow missed the whole coordination penalty. I wondered why my carriers couldn't sink any ship... Not anymore.
When following calculations are met, carrier strikes could have coordination penalty (like bombers flying without fighters):
»Allied TF in 1942 and the number of aircraft in the TF is greater than 100 + rnd (100).
»Allied TF in 1943 and the number of aircraft in the TF is greater than 150 + rnd (150).
»Allied TF in 1944 or later or a Japanese TF at any time and the number of aircraft in the TF is greater than 200 + rnd (200).
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:22 pm
by stuman
I am not paying attention.
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:28 pm
by Grollub
ORIGINAL: stuman
I am not paying attention.
To what?
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:51 am
by P.Hausser
[:D] ok dissregarding thread
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:52 am
by P.Hausser
dissregard my above post
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:25 pm
by Knavey
Huh?
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:22 pm
by alaviner
Nothing to see here - move along
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:40 pm
by TheElf
I sense much
power in you young disregarder....
RE: CV Stacking
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:46 pm
by DivePac88
To disregard, or not to disregard, that is the question why? [:'(]