Page 1 of 2

too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:28 am
by nukkxx5058
Isn't the game too easy ? I played and won my 2 first scenarios (in the menu order) without a lot of thinking.

And I didn't find a difficulty setup. Do I miss something or is the game too easy ?

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:14 am
by nukkxx5058
just had a new victoy playing the slaves in Scirthaea. Too easy. But fun ... ;-)
Is the only possible challenge playing humans online ?

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:20 am
by Ironclad
You will find some scenarios more difficult than others depending on the side you select but multiplayer is the way to go if you want a really challenging game.

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:54 am
by nukkxx5058
The online feature looks good. However, I don't see a lot of open "challenges".  I hope the community will develop fast, together with an official rankings/scale.  etc. .

But the game is fun even if I can see a huge improvement field

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:01 am
by Ironclad
The closed challenges are probably competition games. Open challenges come up fairly regularly so its best to keep checking. In the meantime or during there are some tougher AI scenarios to get your teeth into.

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:05 am
by e_barkmann
Instead of waiting for a challenge, issue a challenge yourself. You'll get a game very quickly!

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:29 am
by nukkxx5058
yes. But I am still a little bit green to do that :lol: I need to play couple opf more games :-)

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:14 am
by jomni
ORIGINAL: nukkxx

The online feature looks good. However, I don't see a lot of open "challenges".  I hope the community will develop fast, together with an official rankings/scale.  etc. .

But the game is fun even if I can see a huge improvement field

There is an active community.
Just make a challenge and there will be someone to take it soon as the other post pointed out.

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:26 am
by blastpop
nukkxx make a challenge- win or lose you'll have fun and I am sure someone will very quickly take your challenge.

Some scenarios may be less than balanced- historical battles are not a 50-50 proposition. Take the difficult - usually non Roman and see what you can do.
[/align]

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:33 am
by nukkxx5058
let me try again a couple of times with AI !

What are the good/fair scenarios for human challenges ?

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 12:12 pm
by blastpop
So far the Corinth scenario is something close to balance. The Achaean league fighting the Romans is probably a 40-60 for 45-55 deficit to win. None the less I think it would be a great scenario to play the Greeks, plus it is much fun.[/align]

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 3:41 pm
by killroyishere
This game is more for multiplayer nukkxx even some of the reviewers have said so. The ai gets low scores but the multiplayer human vs human elements are getting decent scores. I don't play multiplayer games and mostly buy for the ai single player play experience which this one has little as the reviewers have said. Out of 18 scenarios you might find one or two that are challenging. If you really want some ancients challenge try Spartan or Troy or even some of the new HPS ancients games.

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:35 pm
by IainMcNeil
Reviews have said multiplayer is exceptional, not that single player is bad. I greatly enjoy both :)

Why do people who dont like a game feel they must convince others not to like it to justify their own opinion ;)

There are currently over 300 active multiplayer live at any one timne and more every day. It was around 200 last week. If you issue a challenge its unlikely to be there for more than one hour - the problem is more people accept than issue so no matter how bug the community there are hardly any open challenges!

Maybe we should force people to issue challenges once they have accepted a certain number!

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:18 am
by nukkxx5058
Why do people who dont like a game feel they must convince others not to like it to justify their own opinion ;)

Was that for me ???

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:22 am
by jomni
I think it's killroy.

Nukkxx,

Before starting a game you can change the balance by giving the advantage to a particular side.

I played my first game where the AI has the advantage and it was a close fight. I lost. :(



To the devs and experienced players,

What does game balance do? Change the troops stats? Give biased die rolls?

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:29 am
by nukkxx5058
is there an official ladder/scoring for multiplayer games ?

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:47 am
by jomni
not at the moment.
devs say the system can be cheated.
losing payer not continuing the game to avoid losses.

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:29 am
by IainMcNeil
As soon as we close the cheating loophole we'll get some MP stats up there. Too many other jobs right now!

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:49 am
by nukkxx5058
ok cool ! thanks. I will have time to train :-)

RE: too easy? my 2 first games = 2 victories

Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:13 pm
by leastonh1
ORIGINAL: Iain McNeil
There are currently over 300 active multiplayer live at any one timne and more every day.
It will be over 301 on Wednesday. Can't wait [:)]