Page 1 of 1
reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:53 am
by Central Blue
"Mine handling accident aboard ACM Kangaroo at Darwin"
She has 45 float damage and fires at 44. System and engine damage is not too bad.
Good thing the CD routine has been tweaked. [:D]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:23 pm
by CapAndGown
At least your ACM is still alive. I had one sink on me already in March of 42!
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:48 pm
by wwengr
ACM Kangaroo
???
What Mod or Scenario?
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:56 pm
by String
DD Yukikaze collides with CV Hiryu at 129 , 159
.. when just a few hexes from an enemy base packed with LBA ...
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:04 pm
by fflaguna
It is very dark.
CA Maya is likely to be eaten by a grue.
[X(]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:39 pm
by SeethingErmine
"Massive Explosion during loading of xAK Yae Maru at Saipan"
I had 5 ships loading 3 units, and so naturally the ship that exploded was the only one carrying a unit by itself. [:)]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:41 pm
by John 3rd
LOVE all the new 'features' making the game puch more realistic. Good stuff...
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:33 pm
by Grollub
ORIGINAL: fflaguna
It is very dark.
CA Maya is likely to be eaten by a grue.
[X(]
Oh, the Zork days! [:D]
Hmmm ... I wonder if I should rename one of the coming american CVs the "CV Grue" ... [;)]
Nah. Since grues are light-fearing and that hardly applies to a CV, I guess I have to skip that. Would have been better naming a BB with good night experience. [:'(]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:45 pm
by Central Blue
ORIGINAL: wwengr
ACM Kangaroo
???
What Mod or Scenario?
Da Babes Lite of course.
Don't all of the scenarios have
this very fine vessel? [:)]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:50 pm
by freeboy
as I recal the was a huge port wxplosion in Bangalore duringthe war.. leveled an area.. so a little damage to a ship is not too bad..
I always wonder when it states two enemy.. pbem playingas allies.. dd sunk via collition or unknown what really happened, of course in the game what actually in code took them out.. mine? collision? other?
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:03 pm
by SuluSea
ORIGINAL: Central Blue
"Mine handling accident aboard ACM Kangaroo at Darwin"
She has 45 float damage and fires at 44. System and engine damage is not too bad.
Good thing the CD routine has been tweaked. [:D]
The ACM damage or sunk just adds to the realism [so far I've had 3 sunk], I have issues but no doubt they will be addressed in time and make this game just that much better.
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:08 pm
by Central Blue
ORIGINAL: SuluSea
ORIGINAL: Central Blue
"Mine handling accident aboard ACM Kangaroo at Darwin"
She has 45 float damage and fires at 44. System and engine damage is not too bad.
Good thing the CD routine has been tweaked. [:D]
I have issues but no doubt they will be addressed in time and make this game just that much better.
Everyone talks about the fog of war and forgets about the friction. I just treat the "problems" as features and restart after every patch. [:D]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:14 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown
At least your ACM is still alive. I had one sink on me already in March of 42!
One of mine (IJN) blew sky high in Shimonoseki in February 42. I like this feature. As others have said, it's much more realistic.
The CV collision thingy would have me pulling my hair out, but is still a welcome addition to the game.
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:22 pm
by Smeulders
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown
At least your ACM is still alive. I had one sink on me already in March of 42!
One of mine (IJN) blew sky high in Shimonoseki in February 42. I like this feature. As others have said, it's much more realistic.
The CV collision thingy would have me pulling my hair out, but is still a welcome addition to the game.
In a PBEM game as allies I had a Japanese BB escorting KB reported sunk in a collision around the 10-15th of December 41'. Unfortunately the report was later retracted, but I did like the message at the time.
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:51 pm
by fflaguna
CA Maya collides with Guam at 106 , 95
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Guam sinks...
Japanese ground losses:
403 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 10 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
[X(]
RE: reports you don't like to see....
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:44 am
by aciddrinker
ORIGINAL: fflaguna
CA Maya collides with Guam at 106 , 95
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Temporary flotation repairs failing aboard Guam!
Guam sinks...
lol good one, i need try to collide whit Hokkaido in that case 
Japanese ground losses:
403 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 10 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
[X(]