Page 1 of 3

Canadians

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:31 pm
by The Gnome
What do you do with 'em? I have a bunch of yellow link (R) squadrons that I am thinking of sending to the front. Maybe Alaska, they should be used to the cold.


RE: Canadians

Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:43 pm
by vinnie71
There are about 2 fighter and one bomber squadrons that can be redeployed. These I normally send to India (don't ask me why but I do it for no particular reason) but I'm thinking of taking a different approach and send them to the Solomons. Hurricane XII's could be excellent in point defence role.
 
Incidentally the Canadians get a lot of restricted Squadrons which I normally split in two. Some are dedicated to training while the rest are dedicated to maritime patrol. When they start getting Cansos and Venturas they would make life miserable for any Japanese sub operating in the area...

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:43 am
by Sredni
There's also two Canadian fighter squadrons that are on early war british carriers that withdraw. I pulled em off before I sent the carriers home. Take that Admiralty!

Unfortunately just like all the other Canadian air groups the airframes they have access to have limited production with large gaps between production runs. The Canadian airgroups don't seem suitable for any sustained operations for that reason alone.

There are two 16 plane groups in eastern Canada that can be unlocked. They withdraw in late 1943 though. They can use Hurricane XIIB and Kittyhawk I, III, and IV. The Hurricane's were produced from 6/42-8/42 and I have a total of 49 in my pools. The Kittyhawk I was produced from 12/41-8/42 and I have a whopping 35 in my pools. Kittyhawk III from 9/42-10/42, I have 27 so far in mid october 42. And the kittyhawk IV is produced from 9/43-11/43 at 15 a month, so a whopping 45 planes.

I guess for the rest of the war the Canadians are expecting to arm their pilots with sharp sticks and to flap their arms to take off.

The two carrier groups stolen off withdrawn carriers have a bit better production for their pools. But they're still nothing like what I would require for heavy combat.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:18 am
by afspret
I use my Bolingbrook, Shark & Stranraer squadrons for ASW patrols along the Canadian West Coast ('cause I've got some I-Boats plodding around there) and my Kittyhawks are split 50/50 on CAP & training.  One thing I've done in my mod to the Ironman scenario is to tweak the w/d dates of some of the units, just in case those intrepid Sons of Nippon make a visit to the great northwest.
 
Speaking of Ironman and its wildly unpredictable moves, has anybody playing as the allies had the AI invade Alaska?  Just wondering 'cause in my current game against the AI, I'm in the middle of Feb '42 & I've already lost Port Moresby, Baker & Funafuti Islands and on the last turn my PBY squadron at Palmyra spotted an enemy TF, of unknown make up, about 12 hexes out heading east. 

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:56 am
by frank1970
ORIGINAL: Sredni

There's also two Canadian fighter squadrons that are on early war british carriers that withdraw. I pulled em off before I sent the carriers home. Take that Admiralty!

Unfortunately just like all the other Canadian air groups the airframes they have access to have limited production with large gaps between production runs. The Canadian airgroups don't seem suitable for any sustained operations for that reason alone.

There are two 16 plane groups in eastern Canada that can be unlocked. They withdraw in late 1943 though. They can use Hurricane XIIB and Kittyhawk I, III, and IV. The Hurricane's were produced from 6/42-8/42 and I have a total of 49 in my pools. The Kittyhawk I was produced from 12/41-8/42 and I have a whopping 35 in my pools. Kittyhawk III from 9/42-10/42, I have 27 so far in mid october 42. And the kittyhawk IV is produced from 9/43-11/43 at 15 a month, so a whopping 45 planes.

I guess for the rest of the war the Canadians are expecting to arm their pilots with sharp sticks and to flap their arms to take off.

The two carrier groups stolen off withdrawn carriers have a bit better production for their pools. But they're still nothing like what I would require for heavy combat.

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:25 pm
by Wirraway_Ace
ORIGINAL: Frank

ORIGINAL: Sredni

There's also two Canadian fighter squadrons that are on early war british carriers that withdraw. I pulled em off before I sent the carriers home. Take that Admiralty!

Unfortunately just like all the other Canadian air groups the airframes they have access to have limited production with large gaps between production runs. The Canadian airgroups don't seem suitable for any sustained operations for that reason alone.

There are two 16 plane groups in eastern Canada that can be unlocked. They withdraw in late 1943 though. They can use Hurricane XIIB and Kittyhawk I, III, and IV. The Hurricane's were produced from 6/42-8/42 and I have a total of 49 in my pools. The Kittyhawk I was produced from 12/41-8/42 and I have a whopping 35 in my pools. Kittyhawk III from 9/42-10/42, I have 27 so far in mid october 42. And the kittyhawk IV is produced from 9/43-11/43 at 15 a month, so a whopping 45 planes.

I guess for the rest of the war the Canadians are expecting to arm their pilots with sharp sticks and to flap their arms to take off.

The two carrier groups stolen off withdrawn carriers have a bit better production for their pools. But they're still nothing like what I would require for heavy combat.

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

Well, so did the Americans, Brits, Indians, Australians and New Zealanders...That being said, Canada had a very small population, but then so did New Zealand and Australia. Its overall mobilization was smaller (as a percent) of the total poplution than Oz of NZ.

My understanding is that most of its air force personnel never left the country. Wiki, for what it is worth, says 3/4s of its air force personnel stayed in Canada.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:32 pm
by Wirraway_Ace
ORIGINAL: Sredni

There's also two Canadian fighter squadrons that are on early war british carriers that withdraw. I pulled em off before I sent the carriers home. Take that Admiralty!

Unfortunately just like all the other Canadian air groups the airframes they have access to have limited production with large gaps between production runs. The Canadian airgroups don't seem suitable for any sustained operations for that reason alone.

There are two 16 plane groups in eastern Canada that can be unlocked. They withdraw in late 1943 though. They can use Hurricane XIIB and Kittyhawk I, III, and IV. The Hurricane's were produced from 6/42-8/42 and I have a total of 49 in my pools. The Kittyhawk I was produced from 12/41-8/42 and I have a whopping 35 in my pools. Kittyhawk III from 9/42-10/42, I have 27 so far in mid october 42. And the kittyhawk IV is produced from 9/43-11/43 at 15 a month, so a whopping 45 planes.

I guess for the rest of the war the Canadians are expecting to arm their pilots with sharp sticks and to flap their arms to take off.

The two carrier groups stolen off withdrawn carriers have a bit better production for their pools. But they're still nothing like what I would require for heavy combat.
Thanks Sredni.

I use the Canadian patrol and bomber squadrons for ASW duty along the entire West Coast (US and Canada). I use their KVs in ASW TFs as part of air-naval hunter-killer groups to release US ships and aircraft for offensive operations. Additionally, until the 4/42 upgrades for US DDs (and DE conversions), the KVs are the only moderately competent ASW ships available in the Pacific.

I have used the Canadian fighter squadrons to fly CAP over bases in India under medium threat.

I often buy out a Canadian Bde or two to help in NORPAC.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:08 pm
by RUDOLF
I like the Canadien KV's

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 5:27 pm
by Sardaukar
In one of my games vs. IJ AI I sent couple of Canadian brigades to Java. [:D] I as testing if I could hold the island vs. AI in Scen 1. Even when committing all I had it was still close-run thing.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:44 pm
by aspqrz02
ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

My understanding is that most of its air force personnel never left the country. Wiki, for what it is worth, says 3/4s of its air force personnel stayed in Canada.

Empire Air Training Scheme? [&:]

Aka "The aerodrome of democracy" (Roosevelt)? [8D]

100,000 Canadians involved, 10,000 aircraft in Canada involved. 130,000 pilots, navigators, gunners and other aircrew from all over the Commonwealth and allied countries trained?

That would probably explain it [:D][:D][:D]

There's more ways of winning than fighting directly [;)]

Phil

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:32 am
by Sredni
ORIGINAL: Frank

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

Yes heh. From all the history I've read and learned in school I get the impression we never fought in the pacific at all. I know we were very heavily involved in europe from day one, dragged into the war by default with britain. But I never hear much about a Canadian airforce either. Though that I also know instead of joining a canadian airforce a lot of Canadians joined the British airforce. Though I don't know how true that was in WWII compared to WWI (I'm not sure if we even had an airforce in wwi lol).

One of the quotes I hear a lot is that Canada had the 3rd largest navy in the world at the end of the war. How large that could be I dunno (or weather it's in regard to # of hulls, or tonnage or what). Especially considering that the Japanese, German, Italian, and French navies had been decimated by that point it seems kinda like a self congratulatory claim. I bet 99% of the Canadian navy was involved in convoy duty to britain though.

I honestly know more about how other peoples countries participated in the war then my own. Canadian schools arn't really big on our own history.

Just for comparisons sake, right now Canada has a population of 34 million. The United States has a population of 309 million. Around 1/10th the population. Not sure how similar that ratio was during wwII, but it was probably pretty close. You guys have states with more population then our entire country lol.


TBH the lack of airframe production for Canada kinda disappoints me :/. It'd be great to put some Canadian airgroups to work. I wish I could spend political points to increase production, or to transfer some of the 100's of p40E's I have laying around gathering dust to other commands.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:44 am
by Wirraway_Ace
ORIGINAL: aspqrz

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

My understanding is that most of its air force personnel never left the country. Wiki, for what it is worth, says 3/4s of its air force personnel stayed in Canada.

Empire Air Training Scheme? [&:]

Aka "The aerodrome of democracy" (Roosevelt)? [8D]

100,000 Canadians involved, 10,000 aircraft in Canada involved. 130,000 pilots, navigators, gunners and other aircrew from all over the Commonwealth and allied countries trained?

That would probably explain it [:D][:D][:D]

There's more ways of winning than fighting directly [;)]

Phil

Thanks for the clarification Phil. I remembered part of the history. My response was originally for Frank who seemed to be suggesting more Canadian Air Force units were not available in the Pacific because they were fighting in Europe...

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:02 am
by aspqrz02
ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

Thanks for the clarification Phil. I remembered part of the history. My response was originally for Frank who seemed to be suggesting more Canadian Air Force units were not available in the Pacific because they were fighting in Europe...

I actually corresponded with a nice old gent when I was helping moderate soc.history.war.world-war-ii (when it was still human moderated) who was a graduate of EATS/Canada and fought in Burma, India and the ETO during various stages of the war ... interesting career, and he came from Cessnock where my Dad grew up, at about the same time!

And, IIRC, its mentioned in at least one of the more obscure Neville Shute books, in passing ... it certainly doesn't seem to get the prominent mention it deserves these days, which is sad, as the Roosevelt quote shows how important it actually was [:)]

Phil

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:33 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Sredni

ORIGINAL: Frank

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

........ dragged into the war by default with britain.
Warspite1

Canada played an important role in WWII. In particular her fast growing navy was vital during the Battle of the Atlantic and her ship building capacity was key in equipping her navy and helping to provide the escorts to defeat the U-boats. Her motor industry was also important, initially in helping replace vehicles losses at Dunkirk. As a Briton, I am grateful to the assistance of all the Dominions, Colonies and Territories of the Commonwealth, Canada - the oldest Dominion - not least among them.

What I don't understand is the need for the comment above which is a) simply not true and b) is just a typical snide remark against the UK [:-]

Canada's relatively small contribution to the Far East theatre is no doubt because her navy (which was mostly composed of escort vessels) was very much needed in the Atlantic, her air force was largely used to assist bomber and coastal commands and her small army (there was initially no conscription and only volunteers could serve overseas) was deployed in Italy and latter in north-west Europe.

This volunteer rule caused a problem in 1945 when the Canadian cruiser HMCS Uganda left the British Pacific Fleet, with whom she was deployed, and returned home. In May, Uganda's crew were polled to find out whether, after the defeat of Germany, they wanted to volunteer for further service against the Japanese. Two thirds of the crew said no and so the ship returned to Canada. It is said they received a frosty reception from US servicemen as she stopped off at Eniwetok and Pearl Harbor....





RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:46 am
by vinnie71
ORIGINAL: Sredni

ORIGINAL: Frank

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

Yes heh. From all the history I've read and learned in school I get the impression we never fought in the pacific at all. I know we were very heavily involved in europe from day one, dragged into the war by default with britain. But I never hear much about a Canadian airforce either. Though that I also know instead of joining a canadian airforce a lot of Canadians joined the British airforce. Though I don't know how true that was in WWII compared to WWI (I'm not sure if we even had an airforce in wwi lol).

One of the quotes I hear a lot is that Canada had the 3rd largest navy in the world at the end of the war. How large that could be I dunno (or weather it's in regard to # of hulls, or tonnage or what). Especially considering that the Japanese, German, Italian, and French navies had been decimated by that point it seems kinda like a self congratulatory claim. I bet 99% of the Canadian navy was involved in convoy duty to britain though.

I honestly know more about how other peoples countries participated in the war then my own. Canadian schools arn't really big on our own history.

Just for comparisons sake, right now Canada has a population of 34 million. The United States has a population of 309 million. Around 1/10th the population. Not sure how similar that ratio was during wwII, but it was probably pretty close. You guys have states with more population then our entire country lol.


TBH the lack of airframe production for Canada kinda disappoints me :/. It'd be great to put some Canadian airgroups to work. I wish I could spend political points to increase production, or to transfer some of the 100's of p40E's I have laying around gathering dust to other commands.

Yes the Canadians fought mainly in Europe, so much so that half the 'British' contribution to the invasion of Europe was in fact Canadian. I don't know much about Canadian involvement in the Pacific war, but from the rosters seen in game, they make a lot of sense.
Canada also produced a lot of stuff. Navally, it built up a lot of escorts of all types and true enough, shouldered a lot of the escort duties. They also helped build a sizeable amount of merchantmen which helped maintain tonnage available for all sorts of purposes.

Regarding airframes, Canada mostly produced ACs for Britain rather than for itself. Besides I'm under the impression that the Canadian AF was pretty small and that there were quite a lot of Canadian pilots in British squadrons that were never released or were never really concentrated in Canadian squadrons.

In the end Canada contributed mostly in three areas: boots on the ground, convoy escorts and raw materials as well (include food).

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:24 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Offworlder

ORIGINAL: Sredni

ORIGINAL: Frank

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

Yes heh. From all the history I've read and learned in school I get the impression we never fought in the pacific at all. I know we were very heavily involved in europe from day one, dragged into the war by default with britain. But I never hear much about a Canadian airforce either. Though that I also know instead of joining a canadian airforce a lot of Canadians joined the British airforce. Though I don't know how true that was in WWII compared to WWI (I'm not sure if we even had an airforce in wwi lol).

One of the quotes I hear a lot is that Canada had the 3rd largest navy in the world at the end of the war. How large that could be I dunno (or weather it's in regard to # of hulls, or tonnage or what). Especially considering that the Japanese, German, Italian, and French navies had been decimated by that point it seems kinda like a self congratulatory claim. I bet 99% of the Canadian navy was involved in convoy duty to britain though.

I honestly know more about how other peoples countries participated in the war then my own. Canadian schools arn't really big on our own history.

Just for comparisons sake, right now Canada has a population of 34 million. The United States has a population of 309 million. Around 1/10th the population. Not sure how similar that ratio was during wwII, but it was probably pretty close. You guys have states with more population then our entire country lol.


TBH the lack of airframe production for Canada kinda disappoints me :/. It'd be great to put some Canadian airgroups to work. I wish I could spend political points to increase production, or to transfer some of the 100's of p40E's I have laying around gathering dust to other commands.

Yes the Canadians fought mainly in Europe, so much so that half the 'British' contribution to the invasion of Europe was in fact Canadian.
Warspite1

Nominally the contribution to 21st Army Group appears to be 50% British (2nd Army) and 50% Canadian (1st Army) which I assume is where you are getting your idea from. However, this is not the full story. Firstly half the "British" contribution was not provided by Canada - the two countries had their own armies. The British contribution was the British contribution.

Secondly, a proportion of the Canadian 1st Army had to be provided by overseas contingents to make up the numbers - typically a British corps and the Polish corps. With the overseas volunteer rule mentioned above, there simply weren't enough Canadian troops to properly form an Army sized unit. This is not said in anyway to denigrate the Canadian commitment to the second front, but to clarify your comment.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:52 am
by moonraker65
Thwere were some Canadian Units involved in the retaking of Attu and Kiska in the Aleutian Campaign I thought ??

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:28 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: moonraker

Thwere were some Canadian Units involved in the retaking of Attu and Kiska in the Aleutian Campaign I thought ??
Warspite1

I think that Canadian troops were based in that region on the basis that they were not technically leaving North America (and so did not need to pass the volunteer test) but I do not know to what extent they were involved in combat. I would certainly be interest to know if anyone has any info on that.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:24 am
by Sredni
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Sredni

ORIGINAL: Frank

Hm, I would say the Canadians fought in Europe [;)]

........ dragged into the war by default with britain.
Warspite1


What I don't understand is the need for the comment above which is a) simply not true and b) is just a typical snide remark against the UK [:-]


I honestly didn't mean it in a snide way, it's simply how it was, I guess I worded that poorly. WWI and WWII both, Canada was automatically at war once Britain went to war. There was no requirement for Canada to declare war for itself. Hindsight certainly shows that our involvement was both right and just, so nobody could quibble with the outcome. I'm sure there were some who resented being subservient in such a way, but things changed after the war in that we are no longer tied quite so closely so people can't complain about that anymore.

RE: Canadians

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:36 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Sredni

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Sredni




........ dragged into the war by default with britain.
Warspite1


What I don't understand is the need for the comment above which is a) simply not true and b) is just a typical snide remark against the UK [:-]


I honestly didn't mean it in a snide way, it's simply how it was, I guess I worded that poorly. WWI and WWII both, Canada was automatically at war once Britain went to war. There was no requirement for Canada to declare war for itself. Hindsight certainly shows that our involvement was both right and just, so nobody could quibble with the outcome. I'm sure there were some who resented being subservient in such a way, but things changed after the war in that we are no longer tied quite so closely so people can't complain about that anymore.
Warspite1

Okay - but my understanding was that in WWI the declaration of war by Canada WAS automatic along with that of the UK, but in WWII the Canadian parliament took a week or so to decide of its own accord to declare war?