Page 1 of 1

RealPara

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:51 pm
by CSO_Talorgan
IIRC RealPara was mostly about data correction, and of course there'll be no need for that in LSA, will there?

:)

... but remember those Jeeps with the Vickers guns?

Are they in LSA?

RE: RealPara

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
by Nomada_Firefox
There is a AB Jeep, Vickers MMG.

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:24 am
by DasHoff
yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:32 am
by Andrew Williams
Image

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:35 am
by Andrew Williams
n/t


Image

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:47 am
by 7A_Woulf
Don't want to be a wiseacre, but did the Paras really have that many MGs on their Jeeps? The last two pics looks more like 'Commando Cars', used by Special Forces, while the Paras had a single Vickers K-gun, like the 'better-used' Jeep on top pic... 

An interesting, but rather useless, fact: The guys from the Para recce used cookie-jars to store their ammunition, they were perfect for the round mags!

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:59 pm
by D.Ilse
ORIGINAL: DasHoff

yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points

It's a unarmed car that is mostly open with an exposed fighting position. it's supposed to hit and run, using speed and surprise as it assets..against a prepared enemy well you know what happens.

7.92x56mm also is pretty much overkill on it.

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:21 pm
by DasHoff
yeah, i realise that. i would've thought it would be more for recon than open battle. but i decided to use one; thought it might be leet. aha

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:11 pm
by 7A_Woulf
I've seen a few pictures of these guys fighting, and every time they are outside their Jeeps, fighting as regular infantry. (But the Jeeps are cool, I use them as soon as I can!)

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:45 pm
by D.Ilse
If I am taking a A/C out into combat, it's either a 234, M8 or Staghound

even then it's for infantry support and soft-targets. Not for engaging armour, even with something like the 251/22 or 234/4(both armed with 7.5cmL48 KwK)

RE: RealPara

Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:20 pm
by TheReal_Pak40
ORIGINAL: CSO_Talorgan

IIRC RealPara was mostly about data correction, and of course there'll be no need for that in LSA, will there?

:)

... but remember those Jeeps with the Vickers guns?

Are they in LSA?


Oddball just confirmed that the developers did tweak weapon and element protection values. And I think that most people in the MG42 thread would agree that this was a huge mistake. So to answer your question, yes, they'll be a need for data correction unless it's addressed in the upcoming patch.

RE: RealPara

Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:37 am
by kojusoki1
do you find those jeepicons WAY to small? They are VERY tiny - at list IMHO

RE: RealPara

Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:08 am
by CSO_Talorgan
ORIGINAL: DasHoff

yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points

IIRC, in real life the Jeep column, which had been flown in at enormous expense, made a dash for Arnhem Bridge shortly after landing ... and was shot to ribbons en-route. However, in CC II RealPara they made useful machine gun carriers, as long as you kept them back from the front line.