Page 1 of 1
RealPara
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:51 pm
by CSO_Talorgan
IIRC RealPara was mostly about data correction, and of course there'll be no need for that in LSA, will there?
... but remember those Jeeps with the Vickers guns?
Are they in LSA?
RE: RealPara
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:14 pm
by Nomada_Firefox
There is a AB Jeep, Vickers MMG.
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:24 am
by DasHoff
yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:32 am
by Andrew Williams
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:35 am
by Andrew Williams
n/t

RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:47 am
by 7A_Woulf
Don't want to be a wiseacre, but did the Paras
really have that many MGs on their Jeeps? The last two pics looks more like 'Commando Cars', used by Special Forces, while the Paras had a single Vickers K-gun, like the 'better-used' Jeep on top pic...
An interesting, but rather useless, fact: The guys from the Para recce used cookie-jars to store their ammunition, they were perfect for the round mags!
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:59 pm
by D.Ilse
ORIGINAL: DasHoff
yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points
It's a unarmed car that is mostly open with an exposed fighting position. it's supposed to hit and run, using speed and surprise as it assets..against a prepared enemy well you know what happens.
7.92x56mm also is pretty much overkill on it.
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:21 pm
by DasHoff
yeah, i realise that. i would've thought it would be more for recon than open battle. but i decided to use one; thought it might be leet. aha
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:11 pm
by 7A_Woulf
I've seen a few pictures of these guys fighting, and every time they are outside their Jeeps, fighting as regular infantry. (But the Jeeps are cool, I use them as soon as I can!)
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:45 pm
by D.Ilse
If I am taking a A/C out into combat, it's either a 234, M8 or Staghound
even then it's for infantry support and soft-targets. Not for engaging armour, even with something like the 251/22 or 234/4(both armed with 7.5cmL48 KwK)
RE: RealPara
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 11:20 pm
by TheReal_Pak40
ORIGINAL: CSO_Talorgan
IIRC RealPara was mostly about data correction, and of course there'll be no need for that in LSA, will there?
... but remember those Jeeps with the Vickers guns?
Are they in LSA?
Oddball just confirmed that the developers did tweak weapon and element protection values. And I think that most people in the MG42 thread would agree that this was a huge mistake. So to answer your question, yes, they'll be a need for data correction unless it's addressed in the upcoming patch.
RE: RealPara
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 12:37 am
by kojusoki1
do you find those jeepicons WAY to small? They are VERY tiny - at list IMHO
RE: RealPara
Posted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:08 am
by CSO_Talorgan
ORIGINAL: DasHoff
yes they are, and they fucking suck. i stupidly deployed one; first shot took out the tyres, next couple of shots shot killed the crew. what a waste of 18 points
IIRC, in real life the Jeep column, which had been flown in at enormous expense, made a dash for Arnhem Bridge shortly after landing ... and was shot to ribbons en-route. However, in CC II RealPara they made useful machine gun carriers, as long as you kept them back from the front line.