Page 1 of 1
River Crossings
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2002 5:43 am
by Capt. Pixel
I stumbled on a superb little river crossing force - Cavalry.
Match up a couple of companies of Cavalry with a few sections of medium mortars for smoke cover and shoreline suppression, and you've got one h*** of a tough assault group.
They swim across in squad formation. They don't need barges.
They're not subject to the one-hit, one-kill sniper shot that assault boats are.
They can pop smoke AND return fire from the middle of the river!
And even if there IS a mine field on the banks, after a turn or two (and a couple of horses down) they're through and rampaging the backfield.
I did a battle this morning with 7 Co So Cavalry, 2 Partisan plt, 3 medium mortar sections - running over a 250 meter river into 2000 points of defending Germans. The infiltrating Partisans arrived just in time to watch the victrious cavalry charge to the rear area objectives.

I did lose two squads of cavalry tho'.
Very impressive!

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2002 2:28 pm
by Seagull
That
is extremely interesting.
How did you happen to come up with the idea of testing cavalry in a river crossing?
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2002 11:43 pm
by Capt. Pixel
We were setting up a PBEM Assault/Defend and I thought to look at cavalry amphib capabilities. Mostly for flank harassment. After a couple of test runs, I was pretty well convinced that they could do the entire job.
But my opponent decided for an airdrop anyway.

Posted: Sun Jun 16, 2002 6:38 pm
by Wild Bill
Nicely done Captain. Interesting insight!
Wild Bill
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 4:33 am
by chief
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 4:34 am
by Goblin
THERE IS NO USE FOR SKI TROOPS - THEY ARE UTTERLY USELESS!!
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 4:45 am
by chief
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 5:23 am
by Goblin
I can picture the ski troops as an anchor. Thats the only use that there is for them in the game. I hate to even see the words.
Goblin- A Goblin has some animosity:mad:
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:35 am
by chief
No use for Ski Troops?
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 12:45 pm
by Capt. Pixel
Originally posted by Goblin
THERE IS NO USE FOR SKI TROOPS - THEY ARE UTTERLY USELESS!!
Taking a cue from you (and your nasty little Soviet Conscripts in our last game), I've selected Ski Troops as my rear area security.
They're doing well against Soviet Paratroopers in the game I mentioned above. They, combined with MC squads, are doing a fine job of holding the rear areas and harassing scattered paras.
They're not the flashiest guys on the beat, but they're cheap and can sure gum up the works if you have to pound your way through them.

Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 5:11 pm
by Seagull
Has anybody tried ski troops crossing a mine field? Pressure mines should not be set off by ski troops.
Just a thought...
Re: No use for Ski Troops?
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:18 pm
by Kanon Fodder
Originally posted by Capt. Pixel
Taking a cue from you (and your nasty little Soviet Conscripts in our last game), I've selected Ski Troops as my rear area security.
They're not the flashiest guys on the beat, but they're cheap and can sure gum up the works if you have to pound your way through them.
They're a bitch to get moving in July, though ...
(always running out of sun block)

Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2002 7:36 am
by Tomanbeg
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Goblin
THERE IS NO USE FOR SKI TROOPS - THEY ARE UTTERLY USELESS!!
Oh yeah? Wait til some finnish ski troops run down your Kv's in the snow. Then you will understand. You do use them in the snow, right?
T.(Who has never tried pulling them behind an R-Boote).
Cavalry update
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 12:27 am
by Capt. Pixel
Additional note for those thinking of trying the Cavalry/River crossing tactic:
There are TWO types of Cavalry, Heavy and Light. The units I was using were the Soviet Light Cavalry, which have an amphibious speed of 2. Heavy Cavalry have an amphibious speed of 1.
The Heavy Cavalry types are not nearly as good at this approach because of the long delay in swimming the river.
Check your cav's speed before you buy.
Another idea:
River Patrol Boats (towing SMG-armed Ski troops

) in the river to be crossed. Bet your opponent wouldn't expect that! :rolleyes:

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 3:26 am
by Goblin
Originally posted by Tomanbeg
Originally posted by Goblin
THERE IS NO USE FOR SKI TROOPS - THEY ARE UTTERLY USELESS!!
Oh yeah? Wait til some finnish ski troops run down your Kv's in the snow. Then you will understand. You do use them in the snow, right?
T.(Who has never tried pulling them behind an R-Boote).
They cannot close assault. They cannot remove mines. They cannot be useful, because THEY SUCK!! Except for target practice.
Goblin- A Goblin slaps in a new clip

I'm partly to blame for this....
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 4:26 am
by Orzel Bialy
Poor Gob sent in ski troops into a town that I mined the crap out of in our first ( and only head to head game to date )...and well, let's not get into the particulars.
Let's just say that they were less than effective.
In the wilds of the country with thick cover they are great for moving fast and being able to hit somewhat harder. In town or elsewhere...eh, forget it.

No, I was perfectly clear...
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 4:42 am
by Goblin
THEY SUCK EVERYWHERE!!
Any infantry that cannot close assault, cannot throw smoke, and cannot clear mines are worth less than a MG Kuebelwagen!
Goblin- A Goblin spells it out
Orzel, unless you made the ski-troops worthless, it ain't your fault!;)
well....what I meant was...
Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 4:48 am
by Orzel Bialy
I had a hand in helping "discover" how much they suck. Yes...I think that covers what I was trying to imply.

Posted: Wed Jun 19, 2002 4:51 am
by Goblin
Oh, you want due credit!
You are now the co-founder of the Forum-Wide SKI TROOPS SUCK Foundation for the Infantry Impaired!
Goblin- A Goblin gives to the impaired:D