Page 1 of 5

Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:06 pm
by bigred
I sense I enjoy a different sort of AAR. I would like to invite my most respected opponent FatR to participate in this thread. I do not wish to present my future plans here(probably because I dont have any). But I will really enjoy talking about current or past victories or defeats(with alot of bombbast).

Also all readers be advised I will use psyops against FatR through this AAR to gain advantage in the field. I expect his and my comments to "stir a fire". I privately told him I call this "red meat for the spectators".

This thread is a continuation of a game report that began between FatR and Yubari. The senario is Reluctant Admiral #70.
Date is 21july42. Japs are bombing Pearl and invading Trinket in the Andaman chain.
The link to the original Yubari thread:

tm.asp?m=2495125&mpage=8�

RE: Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:56 pm
by topeverest
Good luck...then you are the allies...FATR is quite aggressive as I recall this AAR.

RE: Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 11:41 pm
by bigred
Yes, FatR seems to have been and continues to be aggressive.  He also may be out of gas.

RE: Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:39 pm
by FatR
I'm not aggressive, I, as Nemo121 might have said, just prefer to pursue my strategic goals in consistent and decisive maner.

The rumors that Japan is out of gas is Allied propaganda. Sure, Allies might like to think that their new fighters will save them, but we've predicted the direction of their aircraft development, and our heavy fighter program will show them something they won't forget in a forthnight or so.

More from the dark side, including the message from Tokyo Rose to the doomed defenders of Trinkat after the New Year.

RE: Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:30 pm
by topeverest
This is excellent!  Two spirited commanders.  I will continue to admire the AAR.  

RE: Ocean of (joint) Blood. FatR vs Bigred-

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:50 am
by bigred
  
The rumors that Japan is out of gas is Allied propaganda. Sure, Allies might like to think that their new fighters will save them, but we've predicted the direction of their aircraft development, and our heavy fighter program will show them something they won't forget in a forthnight or so. 

Point of order.  I said FatR was out of gas. Gas, not fuel...

24july42

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 12:58 am
by bigred
Last turn FatR attemped to suppress Little Andy and PB  w/ naval bombbardment since he cant get the job done w/ LBA.  Unfortunatley he instead caught a 3200ton cargo ship unloading at each port.  I must have about 100 of these El cheapo freight ships nearby...and since the VP level is only 2.2 to 1 maybe I can live with this for a while... so the IJN was spending ammo on these ships rather than shelling my troops.. 

Maybe the IJN TF got some experience points for shooting frieghters, this must be like shooting ducks in a barrel....

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:39 am
by bigred
FatR may be able to push me off Trinket w/ this force.  But i suspect he will need alot more.


Image

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:48 am
by FatR
Unless you have forts on Trinkat is at, like, level 5, your defenders are doomed now. I'm not sure if this was an accident, or if the British commanders believed that Japanese don't have enough and anti-tank weapons and supplies on the beach, but:

Ground combat at Trinkat (44,64)
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 1574 troops, 53 guns, 31 vehicles, Assault Value = 175
Defending force 14853 troops, 182 guns, 51 vehicles, Assault Value = 405
Allied adjusted assault: 0
Japanese adjusted defense: 421
Allied assault odds: 1 to 99

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Allied ground losses:
326 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 14 destroyed, 22 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 37 (32 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Looks like the attack was cut to pieces before even closing on the Japanese positions. And judging by the small number of attackers, probably an accident after all, but one that was still costly for the Allied garrizon.

"Before we start the music, the Japanese High Command wishes to announce, that British soldiers of 3rd Hussars Regiment recreated the Charge of the Light Brigade today, in the futile attempt to stop the inevitable liberation of Trinkat. Over 100 British tanks was left on the battlefield or captured by ever-victorious soldiers of the Japanese Empire after the attack was cut down by the overwhelming gunfire. Soon the remaiing defenders will join with their comrades from the other side of the Atlantic, who were left to their fates at Bataan and Lahaina." (c) Zero Hour broadcast from 07/21/42.

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:35 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: FatR

the Japanese High Command wishes to announce, that British soldiers of 3rd Hussars Regiment recreated the Charge of the Light Brigade today....

This is going to be fun. [:D]

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:30 pm
by bigred
Yes, indeed, the commander of the 3rd hussars disobayed direct orders leading his men to a certain death (an leading by example, he died w/ his men)in the false belief that japanese troops could be conquered w/ US Grant tanks alone.


A valiant effort by the 3rd hussars who proved that attack thru a jungle hex w/ tanks alone is not a good idea.  

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 3:38 pm
by bigred
In other news, BB TFs continue to try to shell L'il andaman and PB w/ varying success.  Probably good target practice but a waste of shells as these Tfs keep sinking one 3200 cargo ship every turn.....and this turn they ran into some coastal minesweepers on the way to the target......


RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:15 pm
by FatR
July 22, 00:52 PM aboard battleship Nagato detached to provide bombardment support for the combined assault on Trinkat: "What do you mean we didn't load flares for our floatplanes?"

July 22, 10:12 PM on the lead plane in the formation of Topsies, carrying paratroopers of 2nd Raiding Regiment to Trinkat, upon withnessing flak barrage so thick it seems like a cloud: "How can this be?!? Navy bastards promised to suppress their fire positions!"

July 22, 6:47 AM in the improvised HQ of 2nd Raiding Regiment within the Japanese perimeter of Trinkat that dramatically failed to expand this day: "Well, at least all companies are accounted for on this side of the frontline. Good, looks like we're in for a long stay..."


In other words, this might have ended the same anyway, but I forgot to order floatplanes of my bombardment TF to recon Trinkat and serve as artillery spotters. So my shock attack has failed, thankfully without much destroyed squads.

RE: 20july42

Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:02 pm
by bigred
The 17th Indian division just keeps airlifting in...this is what I call AIRMOBLE. Talk about flack, I have never seen 30 flak hits in one turn. I need to look closely at that unit, see what makes it so special.

Image

RE: 20july42

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:34 am
by FatR
Gods of Japan were benevolent to Admiral Nishimura today, as shells that impacted his cruisers in the battle off Sabang, punched right through, failed to explode properly, or hit nonessential parts. Opposed Americans weren't nearly that lucky, so, despite the screwup that allowed them to bombard the Sabang airfield, they paid for their audacity with a heavy cruiser and at least one destroyer.

Image

RE: 27july42

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:09 am
by bigred
The water around Trinket is full of sharks...Hurah for s39...the boat that brings home the bacon.


Image

RE: 27july42

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:22 am
by FatR
Morning of July 30th, Combined Fleet HQ somewhere in the Pacific (location classified):

Young Navy officer with the latest dispatches from Andamans to Admiral Yamamoto: "...joint command on Trinkat required ships to transport five thousand prisoners from the island. Seized Allied supply dumps were nearly empty, and they exhibit concern about their ability to feed them. Also, 22nd Air Flotilla reports that over the last three days its divebomber force sank two large minelayers, one auxilary ship and one small transport certainly and damaged up to six more enemy ships in the waters around Trinkat. It is assumed that these ships were involved in attempts to resupply the Allied garrizon or conduct minelaying operations in the area."

Admiral Yamamoto: "Oh well. Why the Army couldn't have waited a week more before seizing the island? We don't get this sort of results every day."

RE: 27july42

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:24 am
by FatR
Bigred, you should know that ships are often reported sunk when their flotation damage increases at sea... This is a known code quirk, so, I think it's fair to warn you not to raise your hopes too high :).

RE: 31 july42

Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:19 pm
by bigred





Sure, Allies might like to think that their new fighters will save them, but we've predicted the direction of their aircraft development, and our heavy fighter program will show them something they won't forget in a forthnight or so.
70 Oscars in 2 turns....Not bad for the good guys...FatR better hurry with his new planes...he may not have any planes left when they arrive...

Image

RE: 31 july42

Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:50 pm
by bigred
I see the IJN thinks they can own the world...

Image