Chinese air units
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 4:22 am
The stock AE OB appears to have omitted the International Volunteer Squadron
(which, if present, would have to be in flights with wholly different kinds of equipment)
and the French "squadron" (which is more or less another flight - bigger than the rest
of the IVS - but being French - not yoked to others and not required to use English
or Chinese).
It is VERY hard to know what the exact equipment and location of Chinese air units
was - but it appears that numbers of units are being credited with "modern" US
types long before the planes were even made, never mind shipped, at the start of
the Pacific War as we date it (China of course had been at war for years already).
In particular, numbers of units seem not to have Russian fighters, or Hawk -
and the ROC production programs for Hawk also appear missing (if I have not missed
them somehow). A few units appear later than history with correct upgraded gear,
but -
the real problems with ROC airpower are more technical:
1) Most "squadrons" are credited with tiny numbers of machines, not approaching their
actual strength
2) Chinese base forces are often not only credited with too little ground support (which
MIGHT be correct) - but even when at nominal TO&E - the FORMATION they point at is NOT -
so they will inevitably decline over time. The combination of few effective base forces to
begin with, and ALL of them must be weak in due course, means that ROC units are doome
not to be very effective - even when they get good gear.
Finally, it appears the strongest base force is - as it almost certainly was - at Chunking - but
it has no air units to support. So that city is undefended, and vulnerable to long range unescorted
bombers - quite different from - say - what Japanese writers (see the first book with the title Zero
in English). THEY say it was on such raids they learned that fighter escort was vital. So the start
deployment may be in error - possibly due to some units appearing long after they really existed.
A less important matter is that Chinese squadrons changed groups from time to time, so often
one can find a squadron in the list - but not in the group it is associated with in the historical material
you are reading. I assume it isn't a mistake - that both the data as presented and the data I am reading
are correct - at different times. One could spend the rest of one's life trying to understand all this
OB data to the last decimal point - and my general comment is - the work done was vastly better than
that on the ancestor WITP game was. In many cases, I trust this OB better than what I am reading
that seems to differ from it. Still - in some cases - it appears there are problems - and possibly it was
not understood WHEN certain types actually reached line units in theater? As for the formations
at which base forces point, it is possible that one was copied as a model, and then corrections somehow
failed to take - I do not believe it is deliberate 100 air support squads are to shrink to 30 for example.
(which, if present, would have to be in flights with wholly different kinds of equipment)
and the French "squadron" (which is more or less another flight - bigger than the rest
of the IVS - but being French - not yoked to others and not required to use English
or Chinese).
It is VERY hard to know what the exact equipment and location of Chinese air units
was - but it appears that numbers of units are being credited with "modern" US
types long before the planes were even made, never mind shipped, at the start of
the Pacific War as we date it (China of course had been at war for years already).
In particular, numbers of units seem not to have Russian fighters, or Hawk -
and the ROC production programs for Hawk also appear missing (if I have not missed
them somehow). A few units appear later than history with correct upgraded gear,
but -
the real problems with ROC airpower are more technical:
1) Most "squadrons" are credited with tiny numbers of machines, not approaching their
actual strength
2) Chinese base forces are often not only credited with too little ground support (which
MIGHT be correct) - but even when at nominal TO&E - the FORMATION they point at is NOT -
so they will inevitably decline over time. The combination of few effective base forces to
begin with, and ALL of them must be weak in due course, means that ROC units are doome
not to be very effective - even when they get good gear.
Finally, it appears the strongest base force is - as it almost certainly was - at Chunking - but
it has no air units to support. So that city is undefended, and vulnerable to long range unescorted
bombers - quite different from - say - what Japanese writers (see the first book with the title Zero
in English). THEY say it was on such raids they learned that fighter escort was vital. So the start
deployment may be in error - possibly due to some units appearing long after they really existed.
A less important matter is that Chinese squadrons changed groups from time to time, so often
one can find a squadron in the list - but not in the group it is associated with in the historical material
you are reading. I assume it isn't a mistake - that both the data as presented and the data I am reading
are correct - at different times. One could spend the rest of one's life trying to understand all this
OB data to the last decimal point - and my general comment is - the work done was vastly better than
that on the ancestor WITP game was. In many cases, I trust this OB better than what I am reading
that seems to differ from it. Still - in some cases - it appears there are problems - and possibly it was
not understood WHEN certain types actually reached line units in theater? As for the formations
at which base forces point, it is possible that one was copied as a model, and then corrections somehow
failed to take - I do not believe it is deliberate 100 air support squads are to shrink to 30 for example.

