Page 1 of 1
British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:56 pm
by Don Bowen
Rerding
The British Pacific Fleet: The Royal Navy's Most Powerful Strike Force by David Hobbs. Very detailed description of underway replenishment by the BPF in 1945.
So far, have found two British ships that were used as AE:
Robert Maersk and
Corinda. Also an additional AO:
Carelia, a comercial tanker converted in AO in Australia in 1945.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:12 pm
by Kereguelen
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
Rerding
The British Pacific Fleet: The Royal Navy's Most Powerful Strike Force by David Hobbs. Very detailed description of underway replenishment by the BPF in 1945.
So far, have found two British ships that were used as AE:
Robert Maersk and
Corinda. Also an additional AO:
Carelia, a comercial tanker converted in AO in Australia in 1945.
Interesting, but I'm not sure if Robert Maersk (and its sister ship Gudrun Maersk, also under BPF) really were Armament Stores ships (despite your otherwise excellent source) because both had originally been build as refrigerated cargo ships. Would have been a strange conversion anyway and both are nowhere listed as RFA ships (same with Corinda and Carelia, btw.).
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 6:21 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Well, the Robert Maersk was.
Great book, BTW.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:30 pm
by JWE
Really hard to say, Don, whether a ship was an Ax, Ay, or Az on any given day.
Just for fun, there was bunch of ships in 1941, that the Navy called AGs, but were really replenishment ships for the fleet. One of them had this gigantic 120,000 cubic foot refrigerator capacity for beef sides, hog jowls, butter beans, eggs and bacon. Gigantic till ya realize that's only 1/3 of the 360,000 bale cubics of a medium sized 4-5000 GRT freighter. Sooo .. what do ya call a ship? And if it humped chilled beef one day, and a couple bombs another, was it an xAK, an AK, an AG, an AKE ?? I'm clueless on this one, pal.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:46 pm
by Don Bowen
All this pummels the feces out of poor Don. But "da zygotes" is gonna have some additional British underway rep ships in '45!
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:12 pm
by JWE
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
All this pummels the feces out of poor Don. But "da zygotes" is gonna have some additional British underway rep ships in '45!
Well, perhaps we forgot an orifice, or two. Oh, well.
We probably didn't think of "ships" and "conversions" in terms of what would be needed by a realistic Fleet Train. It's one of those, OK, Didn't think of that, so Rewind, Reset, Refill this with some more Rum please, thank you, Rethink, and Reevaluate. I mean, Zygotes are serious bio precursers.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 8:37 pm
by Don Bowen
My head spins - where is my Run ration?
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:49 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
My head spins - where is my Run ration?
You have to run for your rum? That ain't fair!
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 11:07 pm
by Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
My head spins - where is my Run ration?
You have to run for your rum? That ain't fair!
Evidence of either poor typing or early rum ration...
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:18 pm
by jmalter
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
My head spins - where is my Run ration?
You have to run for your rum? That ain't fair!
Evidence of either poor typing or early rum ration...
can't find my reference book, it's buried somewhere. But the Brits had at least one bakery ship (used for the Normandy invasion), and had a brewery ship for their late-war far-east fleet-supply train.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 7:57 pm
by msieving1
ORIGINAL: JWE
Really hard to say, Don, whether a ship was an Ax, Ay, or Az on any given day.
Just for fun, there was bunch of ships in 1941, that the Navy called AGs, but were really replenishment ships for the fleet. One of them had this gigantic 120,000 cubic foot refrigerator capacity for beef sides, hog jowls, butter beans, eggs and bacon. Gigantic till ya realize that's only 1/3 of the 360,000 bale cubics of a medium sized 4-5000 GRT freighter. Sooo .. what do ya call a ship? And if it humped chilled beef one day, and a couple bombs another, was it an xAK, an AK, an AG, an AKE ?? I'm clueless on this one, pal.
The USN classed them as AF - Provision Stores Ships. The game classifies them as AG. AG in the USN scheme simply meant Miscellaneous Auxiliary, and was used for a wide variety of functions, from general cargo carrying to Q-ships to remote controlled targets.
As far as I can tell, all the AG ships in the game, at least USN, are either AF or AKS - General Issue Stores Ships. They weren't really small ship tenders (the Navy had a bunch of those, mostly converted LSTs). Instead, they were more like floating grocery and department stores, carrying food, clothing, toilet paper, and other items that ships of the fleet might need. The ship in the movie
Mister Roberts was an AKS. Not a very glamorous job, but important all the same.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:29 am
by Pascal_slith
Is there a book about the history of the RFA, especially pre-WWII and during WWII?
Didn't the RN only develop/train for UnRep during the second half of the war?
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:51 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: Pascal
Is there a book about the history of the RFA, especially pre-WWII and during WWII?
Didn't the RN only develop/train for UnRep during the second half of the war?
I doubt that - I've read numerous accounts of them doing UnRep on convoy escorts even before Pearl Harbor.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:02 pm
by Iron Duke
ORIGINAL: Pascal
Is there a book about the history of the RFA, especially pre-WWII and during WWII?
Didn't the RN only develop/train for UnRep during the second half of the war?
try - The Royal Fleet Auxilliary . A Century of Service by Thomas A Adams and James R Smith ISBN 1-86176-259-3
Covers from 1905 to 2005
Royal Navy conducted the first RAS (Replenishment at Sea) in 1906 between HMS Dominion and Petroleum transfering fuel across the stern of the tanker(Stirrup Method).
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 4:59 pm
by mike scholl 1
ORIGINAL: Kereguelen
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
Rerding
The British Pacific Fleet: The Royal Navy's Most Powerful Strike Force by David Hobbs. Very detailed description of underway replenishment by the BPF in 1945.
So far, have found two British ships that were used as AE:
Robert Maersk and
Corinda. Also an additional AO:
Carelia, a comercial tanker converted in AO in Australia in 1945.
Interesting, but I'm not sure if Robert Maersk (and its sister ship Gudrun Maersk, also under BPF) really were Armament Stores ships (despite your otherwise excellent source) because both had originally been build as refrigerated cargo ships. Would have been a strange conversion anyway and both are nowhere listed as RFA ships (same with Corinda and Carelia, btw.).
Given the susceptability of explosives to deterioration under heat, this would make good sense when planning for service in the Pacific.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:18 pm
by JWE
ORIGINAL: Iron Duke
ORIGINAL: Pascal
Is there a book about the history of the RFA, especially pre-WWII and during WWII?
Didn't the RN only develop/train for UnRep during the second half of the war?
try - The Royal Fleet Auxilliary . A Century of Service by Thomas A Adams and James R Smith ISBN 1-86176-259-3
Covers from 1905 to 2005
Royal Navy conducted the first RAS (Replenishment at Sea) in 1906 between HMS Dominion and Petroleum transfering fuel across the stern of the tanker(Stirrup Method).
The RFA website has a nice list of books, including the one Pascal (ed, oops, Iron Duke) mentioned. Perhaps try here:
http://www.historicalrfa.org/the-rfa-in-print
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:33 am
by CaptBeefheart
I don't know about you guys, but I'd certainly like a brewery ship to be part of my fleet (maybe as an "AB?"), although it would certainly have to be very well protected lest it sink and crush morale.
Cheers,
CC
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 1:01 pm
by Skyland
Do not forget to add one of the french navy's wine tanker.
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:48 pm
by SargeantTex
I read where the US Navy was concerned about a British Task Force operating with their CBGs because the British still used the over the stern replenishment and felt they wouldnt be able to keep up with them!!!
RE: British Pacific Fleet Replenishment
Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:26 pm
by msieving1
ORIGINAL: SargeantTex
I read where the US Navy was concerned about a British Task Force operating with their CBGs because the British still used the over the stern replenishment and felt they wouldnt be able to keep up with them!!!
In general, British replenishment procedures were less efficient than US procedures, and the RN oilers were slower. Admiral King thought the British would be dependent on US support, and was reluctant to provide that support. As it turned out, the BPF did require more US support than had originally been intended, but the US commanders on the scene, Nimitz and Halsey, had no problem with providing the support.