Page 1 of 1
Dead Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:58 pm
by fodder
Thanks for nothing CS.
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:12 am
by Commander Stormwolf
Nakajima Ki-68 / G5N was junk.. either service rating 5 with mamoru engines or service rating 3 with Kasei but a top speed of 250mph
would have been a better idea to build H8K emilies (269 mph with Kasei) and doesn't need an AF [8D]
(and it can carry a radar + depth charges, or torpedoes, or lots of 250kg ordnance [;)])
and it has lots of 20mm turrets.. and it has armor and self sealing tanks..
basically it's a B-24 liberator with floats [:)]
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:14 am
by Commander Stormwolf
Bwahaha [:D]
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:44 am
by Commander Stormwolf
who needs kido butai when you have Ryujo and 25 kamikawa maru cargo ships [;)]
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:58 am
by Commander Stormwolf
here's an idea for a signature [;)]
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:07 am
by DuckofTindalos
Here's an idea for something you can do: stop hijacking his thread.
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:47 am
by castor troy
stormwolf, what's the reason you turn every thread into this stupid BS lately? Who cares about your fantasy? Stop stamming the forum, you are just a pain.
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:28 am
by Historiker
Our neglect of his fantastic ideas forces him to promote them again and again...
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:47 am
by Omat
I think Commander Stormwolf is also a UN Belgian paratrooper [:D]
Omat
RE: Stats for the Ki-68 or Ki-85
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 12:00 pm
by Commander Stormwolf
Scenario design forum