Map size to Point Levels
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2002 11:26 pm
I have a question about the size of maps to the unit point values people use. Considering map size from the smallest to the huge maps I've played on, I was wondering what some would consider a "normal" point level for each.
There are times I think there are way too many units on a given map. For example 5000 points is a huge force for a small map, but would turn a huge map into a series of small skirmishes. On the small map those 5000 pts give me a force large enough to man unbroken trench lines running from map edge to map edge. At 10,000 pts, I can do the same on a medium sized map, and close to it on a large one.
So my question is.....
What is the optimal map size for max point levels preferred by the warrior's out there?
For example, I prefer more mobile battles (which the AI doesn't do very well) to stationary slugfests, so I tend to think 5000 is too many points for a medium map. Discussion, debate, preferences?
There are times I think there are way too many units on a given map. For example 5000 points is a huge force for a small map, but would turn a huge map into a series of small skirmishes. On the small map those 5000 pts give me a force large enough to man unbroken trench lines running from map edge to map edge. At 10,000 pts, I can do the same on a medium sized map, and close to it on a large one.
So my question is.....
What is the optimal map size for max point levels preferred by the warrior's out there?
For example, I prefer more mobile battles (which the AI doesn't do very well) to stationary slugfests, so I tend to think 5000 is too many points for a medium map. Discussion, debate, preferences?