Page 1 of 1
Loss of division-hood
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:45 am
by erstad
I have at least two IJA divisions which used to be "XXX division" and are now just "XXX". Among other things, this means they have lost the divide capability. I would worry they might also lose the divisional cohesiveness bonus in combat.
Is this a known problem? If not, I can post a save but it's going to take a little digging to see when it actually occurred.
This has nothing to do with fragments. The former divisions are still fully intact, and even when a division has a fragment preventing the divide it's still called "XXX division"
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:45 am
by michaelm75au
Sounds like data corruption of the unit's suffix.
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:15 pm
by witpqs
I had that in a very old game but the other way around. A brigade became a division, but kept the same TOE. Heppened on an older patch, BTW
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:00 am
by michaelm75au
ORIGINAL: erstad
I have at least two IJA divisions which used to be "XXX division" and are now just "XXX". Among other things, this means they have lost the divide capability. I would worry they might also lose the divisional cohesiveness bonus in combat.
Is this a known problem? If not, I can post a save but it's going to take a little digging to see when it actually occurred.
This has nothing to do with fragments. The former divisions are still fully intact, and even when a division has a fragment preventing the divide it's still called "XXX division"
Post a save and I can confirm if is data issue or something else?
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:34 am
by erstad
I plan to, I just need to spend some time to find out what turn it happened on.
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:09 pm
by erstad
OK, here's the save. My save from before i sent to the allied player shows the 116th as a division, I run this turn under what labels itself as 1.0.6.1108r6, and it is no longer a division.
The 39th probably undivisioned this turn as well, but I focused on the 116th to narrow this down.
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:34 am
by michaelm75au
Good news is it doesn't happen under 1119.
Bad news is I can't trace it under 1108r6 as that is ever before the last official patch (1108r9).
Hard to tell if any of the later fixes corrected this before r9.
RE: Loss of division-hood
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:24 am
by SuluSea
This happened to me as well with the 48th Division, game started with patch 1108r9. I'm glad you got it straight Micheal.
