Page 1 of 1

Is this gamey?

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:20 pm
by AFV
In the course of trying to use Naval movement as the Soviet, I was unable to move a Soviet Tank Corp unit. So, I thought if I broke it down, maybe I could move a brigade. After breakdown, I still could not transport a single tank brigade, but all that is irrelevant. What happened when I broke down the Tank Brigade was I gained 3 APs. After some experimentation, I realized this was probably WAD since when you breakdown a Corp, you lose the support units, and to make the Corp "whole" again, you would need to use those 3 gained APs to put the SUs back in it. Its the same for Cavalry and Infantry Corp units- you gain in APs however many SUs you have in the unit.

Which leads to my question: If you find that you are short some APs (for example, lets say you wanted to build a division, but only had 8 AP points), is it ok to "borrow" from this AP bank, or would you consider that gamey?

RE: Is this gamey?

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:12 pm
by Michael T
I think that the Soviet AP numbers are so low that if you find a way to ease the situation then why not. Really the Soviets should be getting more AP.

RE: Is this gamey?

Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:28 pm
by morvael
- Hey guys, a corps near Leningrad just send back it's support units to it's army HQ!
- Great, now we can order this new rifle division to be built in Stalingrad.

[:D]

I think it's not gamey, only there is lack of logic, but what the hell. You are not farming any points this way, the balance stays the same.

RE: Is this gamey?

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:08 am
by Peltonx
Could just stick to a historical time line and there would be no need for all the loop holes.

RE: Is this gamey?

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 12:28 am
by Michael T
Historical OOB. Yes please.