More Feedback
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:15 am
Gents
I think the business of disbanding units needs looking at some more. I am pleased that you took action on the gamey disbanding of fleets, but this needs to happen for land units too.
Economically it appears there are major benefits to disbanding units and building again when required. The example of the Canadian Infantry and the Bulgarians have been mentioned previously.
Whilst in any good wargame economic factors are important - and this game cleverly has rules in play to ensure countries cannot just buy units without restriction and without weighing up the costs going forward - the benefits of gamey disbanding, turns the game more away from a war game and more an exploitation of the rules by carrying out unrealistic disbanding.
Personally, as a wargamer I do not want to be getting into that.
To be clear, this is no criticism of players who are doing this - good luck to them for working it out and getting the best out of the rules - I would, from a personal point of view, prefer to see this feature removed*.
*For the avoidance of doubt I do not mean removal of disbanding altogether, there may be be sound military reasons for so doing. But this should not include disbanding the Canadians as soon as they appear so that you can build them in the UK - thus saving on time of arrival and cost in transit - not to mention the immediate, and free, increase to the UK treasury.
I think the business of disbanding units needs looking at some more. I am pleased that you took action on the gamey disbanding of fleets, but this needs to happen for land units too.
Economically it appears there are major benefits to disbanding units and building again when required. The example of the Canadian Infantry and the Bulgarians have been mentioned previously.
Whilst in any good wargame economic factors are important - and this game cleverly has rules in play to ensure countries cannot just buy units without restriction and without weighing up the costs going forward - the benefits of gamey disbanding, turns the game more away from a war game and more an exploitation of the rules by carrying out unrealistic disbanding.
Personally, as a wargamer I do not want to be getting into that.
To be clear, this is no criticism of players who are doing this - good luck to them for working it out and getting the best out of the rules - I would, from a personal point of view, prefer to see this feature removed*.
*For the avoidance of doubt I do not mean removal of disbanding altogether, there may be be sound military reasons for so doing. But this should not include disbanding the Canadians as soon as they appear so that you can build them in the UK - thus saving on time of arrival and cost in transit - not to mention the immediate, and free, increase to the UK treasury.