Page 1 of 2

not getting any hits

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:39 pm
by towers58
I am flying my P-38Gs (load of 3200 ibs.) on airfield attacks and I am not getting any hits. My pilots are experienced and skilled, the base being targeted is well-detected. The planes are flying, just not causing any damage. I have tried changing the altitude (any and all from 1,000 to 9,000.) Medium bombers are okay, as are the heavies, but FB's result in the goose egg.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:57 pm
by Captain Cruft
What's the range?

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:42 pm
by towers58
As close as 4 hexes and as far as 8 (flying with drop tanks).

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:00 pm
by pws1225
Could it be that the drop tanks are mounted where the bombs would normally go? If so, that could explain you've had no results from your 'bomb' runs.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:09 pm
by Q-Ball
My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:29 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: towers58

I am flying my P-38Gs (load of 3200 ibs.) on airfield attacks and I am not getting any hits. My pilots are experienced and skilled, the base being targeted is well-detected. The planes are flying, just not causing any damage. I have tried changing the altitude (any and all from 1,000 to 9,000.) Medium bombers are okay, as are the heavies, but FB's result in the goose egg.

Screenshot of your pilots would be helpful. Also, screenshot of your squadron (with orders set as you would for airfield attacks) would be helpful too.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:28 pm
by HansBolter
Don't pure fighter types (F) need to be at 100 ft. altitude (strafing) to make an attack on an airfield or a ship or a ground unit, regardless of whether or not they carry bombs?

It's my understanding that a fighter bomber type (FB) can bomb from varying altuitudes, but a fighter can only attack non air targets from an altitude of 100 ft.

Can anyone correct me, or do I have it right?

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:45 pm
by DaveConn
Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:02 pm
by JocMeister
ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.

+1

Stop using them as bombers! [X(]

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:11 pm
by Paladin1dcs
ORIGINAL: JocMeister

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

My two cents, the P-38 is too valuable as a fighter, and too limited in numbers, to try to use as a bomber.

+1

Stop using them as bombers! [X(]

I've seen some JFBs complaining about Allied 4E bombers being more lethal than the Allied fighters, so why not use the fighters as bombers? [:D]

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:36 pm
by HansBolter
ORIGINAL: DaveConn

Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.


Are you sure they are bombing from the altitude you set or cruising to the target at that altitude and dropping to 100 feet to strafe when they reach the target just as torpedo bombers fly to the target at whatever altitude you set and then drop to torpedo delivery height when they reach the target?

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:01 pm
by DaveConn
ORIGINAL: DaveConn

Pretty sure this is not correct; I am almost positive I have conducted ground attack missions with P-40Ks from several thousand feet.




Are you sure they are bombing from the altitude you set or cruising to the target at that altitude and dropping to 100 feet to strafe when they reach the target just as torpedo bombers fly to the target at whatever altitude you set and then drop to torpedo delivery height when they reach the target?

The combat report showed them as bombing from higher altitude; see the example below.

Afternoon Air attack on Sasebo 5th SNLF, at 68,105 (Kolaka)

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 6,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes


Allied aircraft
B-25C Mitchell x 13
Kittyhawk III x 11
B-25C Mitchell x 12
P-40K Warhawk x 22


Allied aircraft losses
B-25C Mitchell: 2 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



Aircraft Attacking:
13 x B-25C Mitchell bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb
12 x B-25C Mitchell bombing from 6000 feet
Ground Attack: 6 x 500 lb GP Bomb
22 x P-40K Warhawk bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 1 x 500 lb GP Bomb


(Before anyone asks why on earth I am bombing with P-40s from 10K feet, I was trying to figure out whether the mission altitude affects the attack altitude for fighters; I think it does, but didn't try it enough to settle the issue.)

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:38 am
by Capt Hornblower
I don't know about the effects of a combined strike (as in DaveConn's case), but I've had some Hurricanes attacking Japanese ground units in Burma, and they transit at 6000', but the combat report has the attack coming at strafing height of 100'.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:11 am
by Alfred
ORIGINAL: HansBolter

Don't pure fighter types (F) need to be at 100 ft. altitude (strafing) to make an attack on an airfield or a ship or a ground unit, regardless of whether or not they carry bombs?

It's my understanding that a fighter bomber type (FB) can bomb from varying altuitudes, but a fighter can only attack non air targets from an altitude of 100 ft.

Can anyone correct me, or do I have it right?

Not quite. You are confusing the mechanics of attacking barges and PT boats. Fighter bombers will attack these ships irrespective of their assigned altitude. Whereas fighters will only attack them if assigned to 100'.

Alfred

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:09 am
by Sardaukar
Do not select "Use drop tanks". That will prevent them using bombs.

Pretty logical, I think.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:31 pm
by Alfred
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Do not select "Use drop tanks". That will prevent them using bombs.

Pretty logical, I think.

Further to Sardaukar's point, read michaelm's posts in this thread.

tm.asp?m=3202687&mpage=1&key=centerline ... n&#3203458

Alfred

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:46 pm
by towers58
I was thinking the same way as Moose - by adding the drop tanks I thought I was able to burn extra supply to get the longer range and still carry ordinance. Sardaukar's comment makes sense now, though.

For those complaining about the use of the P-38 in a ground attack role - I seem to be very short-handed in terms of 2E bombers and the Lightning carries almost the same bomb load.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:56 pm
by witpqs
All you have to do is look at the aircraft display WHEN you have drop tanks selected and it shows what weapons it carries with the drop tanks. Some aircraft do still carry torpedoes, large bombs, etc. when also fitted with drop tanks, but other aircraft don't.

If you look at the display when you have selected no drop tanks then you see the weapons the plane carries when drop tanks are not fitted.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:25 pm
by Cpt Sherwood
I learned that when my Wildebeasts would not do a Naval Attack on a TF one hex away. I had left drop tanks selected.

RE: not getting any hits

Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:39 pm
by Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: Cpt Sherwood

I learned that when my Wildebeasts would not do a Naval Attack on a TF one hex away. I had left drop tanks selected.

And I thought it was just me. [8D]