Page 1 of 2

DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 6:36 pm
by geofflambert
Did ya'll see the Brits are pulling one of these out of the Channel and it's supposedly in good shape?


Image

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 7:14 pm
by moonraker65
Pretty rare beast these days I think. Should be interesting if they can get it out and maybe do some restoration

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 7:36 pm
by Dixie
ORIGINAL: moonraker

Pretty rare beast these days I think. Should be interesting if they can get it out and maybe do some restoration

iirc it'll be the only one. I'm not sure about the restoration though, after so long in the sea a restoration would likely involve building a new aeroplane. They aren't too sure how she'll react when she's pulled out either so they got some specially designed storage ready (at Cosford I think). Maybe they'll display her like the Halifax at Hendon in 'as found/recovered' condition.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 7:51 pm
by DivePac88
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Did ya'll see the Brits are pulling one of these out of the Channel and it's supposedly in good shape?

Which one... the top one, or the bottom one? [:'(]

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 8:19 pm
by Encircled
Dornier Do-17

Full story on the BBC here

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 8:26 pm
by tocaff
Obviously the bottom one. [;)]

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:54 pm
by geofflambert
ORIGINAL: DivePac88
Which one... the top one, or the bottom one? [:'(]
Well, the bottom one appears to be in great shape, so it must be the top one. [:'(]

RE: DO-17

Posted: Fri May 03, 2013 11:57 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

ORIGINAL: DivePac88
Which one... the top one, or the bottom one? [:'(]
Well, the bottom one appears to be in great shape, so it must be the top one. [:'(]
warspite1

[&:] I don't understand - they both look the same shape to me [&:]

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:06 am
by geofflambert
I'm joking about syntax, as DivePac was, what is the subject of the sentence and the object, etc.. I'm sure they were both in excellent shape.

I should note that DivePac nailed me, and my response was lame at best.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:09 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

I'm joking about syntax, as DivePac was, what is the subject of the sentence and the object, etc.. I'm sure they were both in excellent shape.

I should note that DivePac nailed me, and my response was lame at best.
warspite1

I know - I was doing the same thing........

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:22 am
by geofflambert
When I was a kid, I was better than most at diagramming sentences, but I hated it just as much as all the other kids. I still managed to avoid learning many things, I just have a rule, if it sounds good, go with it. For instance, I don't know what makes a verb transitive different than any other verb, plus if someone starts talking about Latin declensions, I get really irritated. Amo, amat, amas, yada yade yado. I beg of all of you, puhleese do not explain these things to me, you will do me irreparable harm.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:27 am
by geofflambert
ORIGINAL: warspite1

I know - I was doing the same thing........

Now, by doing the same thing, did you mean joking or giving a lame response?

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:29 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

When I was a kid, I was better than most at diagramming sentences, but I hated it just as much as all the other kids. I still managed to avoid learning many things, I just have a rule, if it sounds good, go with it. For instance, I don't know what makes a verb transitive different than any other verb, plus if someone starts talking about Latin declensions, I get really irritated. Amo, amat, amas, yada yade yado. I beg of all of you, puhleese do not explain these things to me, you will do me irreparable harm.
warspite1

I love it when you talk dirty

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:33 am
by geofflambert
I'm afraid I may be forced to bean you with a Rosetta Stone.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:35 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

I'm afraid I may be forced to bean you with a Rosetta Stone.
warspite1

Great thanks!....er...what does that mean?

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:37 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

ORIGINAL: warspite1

I know - I was doing the same thing........

Now, by doing the same thing, did you mean joking or giving a lame response?
warspite1

A lame jokey response to be precise.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:38 am
by geofflambert
Sorry to have gone over your head, whoosh. Do you have some sort of cloaking device? I keep looking at who is in the forum and "warspite 1" never appears.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:40 am
by geofflambert
Oops, I just saw it, it just appeared. You must have had to lower your shields in order to fire another zinger.

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:46 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Sorry to have gone over your head, whoosh. Do you have some sort of cloaking device? I keep looking at who is in the forum and "warspite 1" never appears.
warspite1

I do not need a cloaking device - I am a content free zone [:D]

RE: DO-17

Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 12:48 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: geofflambert

Oops, I just saw it, it just appeared. You must have had to lower your shields in order to fire another zinger.
warspite1

Yes, I must confess - firing my Zinger as much as I can is a hobby of mine