Kentucky Event is Broken
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 10:55 am
There have been a few fixes to KY, but the newest one creates a completely unrealistic situation and needs to be fixed.
Kentucky, unless one side chooses to intervene, will not open until January, 1863. When that fires, the actual event looks fine; the Rebs get a few volunteers around Bowling Green, and the RR is cut heading north (The Louisville and Nashville was owned and operated by Unionists). That part works.
But Jan 1863? No way.
I attend church with a Professor of American History, and I asked him casually if he thought KY could have stayed neutral. He said not a chance; when Polk grabbed Columbus, many felt that the State Legislature, which had a very strong Unionist majority, was heading toward ending neutrality. Camp Robinson was a clear violation of that, yet nothing happened. In the elections of 1861, 9 out of 10 US Congressmen elected were Unionists, the exception being the pro-Southern region around Bowling Green.
In his view, KY was going to "Open" in the Fall of 1861 regardless, somehow. Civil Wars force all to choose sides, and this was happening in KY. Unionists were enlisting, and so were Rebel sympathizers. At some point, Shooting would have started in KY, and would have inevitably let to war, and the end of neutrality. Any idea of neutrality in Missouri ended quickly when shots were fired. "Missouri Neutrality" lasted about 5 minutes after the Camp Jackson affair.
In Game, the penalties are too harsh for the Union to voluntarily select "end KY Neutrality" to do so, and the South player would be nuts to open it; it's a perfect shield.
I would like other's opinions, but KY neutrality needs to end in Dec 1861 at the latest, IMO.
Absent this change, unless KY seceeds (which is absurd, and would not have happened), games will not have any 1862 campaigns in KY or Tennessee. Which is not good.
Kentucky, unless one side chooses to intervene, will not open until January, 1863. When that fires, the actual event looks fine; the Rebs get a few volunteers around Bowling Green, and the RR is cut heading north (The Louisville and Nashville was owned and operated by Unionists). That part works.
But Jan 1863? No way.
I attend church with a Professor of American History, and I asked him casually if he thought KY could have stayed neutral. He said not a chance; when Polk grabbed Columbus, many felt that the State Legislature, which had a very strong Unionist majority, was heading toward ending neutrality. Camp Robinson was a clear violation of that, yet nothing happened. In the elections of 1861, 9 out of 10 US Congressmen elected were Unionists, the exception being the pro-Southern region around Bowling Green.
In his view, KY was going to "Open" in the Fall of 1861 regardless, somehow. Civil Wars force all to choose sides, and this was happening in KY. Unionists were enlisting, and so were Rebel sympathizers. At some point, Shooting would have started in KY, and would have inevitably let to war, and the end of neutrality. Any idea of neutrality in Missouri ended quickly when shots were fired. "Missouri Neutrality" lasted about 5 minutes after the Camp Jackson affair.
In Game, the penalties are too harsh for the Union to voluntarily select "end KY Neutrality" to do so, and the South player would be nuts to open it; it's a perfect shield.
I would like other's opinions, but KY neutrality needs to end in Dec 1861 at the latest, IMO.
Absent this change, unless KY seceeds (which is absurd, and would not have happened), games will not have any 1862 campaigns in KY or Tennessee. Which is not good.